for a serious match yea battlefield 3, for a fun gaming then mw3, I prefer mw3 tbh but then again I was never into any of the battlefield games, they are boring

but cod vita will be better than both of them

Wats the difference between the two..which is more fun and easy to kill people online

not much different, bf3 requires team work as mw3 doesn't, but I'll just put it like this... get mw3, it's far more fun online and faster paced, jump in any free for all matches and just gun down any mother a you see, don't listen to the guys on here saying bf3 is better, it's not, it's slower and requires alot of patience which you will get bored, your after easy and fun online.? pick mw3, if you want tactical team work then pick bf3.

I might aswell just get mw3 then although I never played 2...cos I'm gonna be playing it by myself not multiplayer....So mw3 it is:D thanks for the info mate

If you have no-one to play with then get MW3, you'd be welcome to join us online if you get Battlefield 3 though.

mw2 was average, mw3 is alot and I mean alot better than mw2, the story in mw3 is good too, you don't want team work then yea get it.... It's better and also they do actually do team work online but not as much like bf3, basically in bf3 you really do HAVE to team work to win, on mw3 you given a choice of help your team mates or go be a hero ... good choice.... mw3 is better.

Come on, he can still play with his own friends on mw3 lol, it can be a even more fun for him, you can't say of your Billy no mates then mw3 is better for you

The recent DLC for BF3 lets you be a hero, it's better than MW3 and so was MW2.

or and it can be fun teaming up with other online users, support them or not then that's upto you to decide on mw3