Page #: 77/83 |
@alvar89 | 30 March 17 | |
@ manszar - 29.03.17 - 10:59pm Are you saying someone who molesters children wont be forgiven if asked in the name of jesus? This is just some bitter nonsense tho. You can fabricate alsorts of things like this all day thinking youreself angry on it that does not make the atonement of sin not a single ounch less effective. But i dont consider a man choosing a so called servant of God man made role and doing the wicked things behind closed doors not even a genuine convert anyway rather a confused sinner trying to hide under religion to feel better. Thing is theanalogue you compose has a sense of non genuine asking for forgiveness in it and in that case it would not help. |
||
@alvar89 | 30 March 17 | |
@ quiller - 27.03.17 - 11:00am Is there no biblical ordinance against the molestation of children? I dont know any specifics but i do know there was a norm to follow it did not individually point out every perversion of the right thing. We do know what Jesus said would be with ppl leading those little ones astray away from Him. |
||
@alvar89 | 30 March 17 | |
@ manszar - 29.03.17 - 10:54pm Yeah sure You can think that i am only looking censored content and am brainwashed if it makes you feel better i dont mind |
||
@alvar89 | 30 March 17 | |
@ manszar - 29.03.17 - 11:20pm how is it a conspiracy if that is what happend. What is talked about you mostly ignore you only focus on what you can twist. Like your claim the son of man is god when not even in daniel does it say that. How the suffering servant was god when it does not say that. In both it shows who god is and its not ether of those you claim. You say the devil is the one to strike the heal of the messiah but we see in the bible its god. You claim jesus sits on the throne of david. But we see there is no thone and the people of david do not consider jesus as their king. You say jesus is the word of god but jesus says they are not his words. Ect ect nothing you say is real because it is all made up so a man can become god. It is so plane to see, but not by those that desire salvation because to them its a nesersary truth. You picking up rumors and conspiracies you like does not make them true tho. You can speculate and think what could have been made by Constatine all you want it will still remain one of the wild conspiracy theories out of many others. |
||
@alvar89 | 30 March 17 | |
You are just doing this out of the sake of arguing even tho you know the Logos was from withing God and is God who became Jesus. You can play around it infinetly and it wont get anyone anywhere here.
|
||
@quiller | 31 March 17 | |
@ alvar89 - 30.03.17 - 10:46pm I dont know any specifics but i do know there was a norm to follow it did not individually point out every perversion of the right thing. We do know what Jesus said would be with ppl leading those little ones astray away from Him. So, you know of no specific prohibition against r*ping children, but you know they followed it any way? One might wonder why there is no such specific prohibition against pedastry when there are prohibitions against homosexual acts. |
||
@quiller | 31 March 17 | |
@ alvar89 - 30.03.17 - 10:37pm You can speculate all you want on the age of mary it was never written down. Thing is what you keep missing is the fact that she was a virgin when she gave birth so there was no r*pe or abuse whatever your mocking minds come up with. I dont know any specifics but i do know there was a norm to follow for betrothal in 1st century Judaism. |
||
@alvar89 | 31 March 17 | |
@ quiller - 31.03.17 - 09:48am I dont know any specifics but i do know there was a norm to follow for betrothal in 1st century Judaism. The agenda behind this speculation is what matter in reality. Ppl go as far as lie and forge dirt on Christianity most of the time. Why bother if its not for you? Ppl try to make Rebekah also into being a child when married to Isaac but dissmiss the fact that she got the first child with him 20 years after the marriage. They go as far as claim it as a fact that she was 3 years old lol. Even tho 3 year olds doint carry water to animals. |
||
@quiller | 1 April 17 | |
It isn't speculation to know the usual, every day, marriage practice of 1st century judaism, as followed by those who were considered pious and righteous. To assert that one particular couple underwent different marriage practice requires evidence. Without such evidence the assertion requires implicit speculation.
|
||
@alvar89 | 1 April 17 | |
@ quiller - 1.04.17 - 09:40am It isn't speculation to know the usual, every day, marriage practice of 1st century judaism, as followed by those who were considered pious and righteous. To assert that one particular couple underwent different marriage practice requires evidence. Without such evidence the assertion requires implicit speculation. Even then it was a man made tradition not inspired or commanded by God thru prophets or scripture. Just as many other things you atheists slide under Gods rug. |
||