Page #: 2/4 |
@ondafire | 23 May 13 | |
seems just because Sony set the trend for the number after the name everyone obviously has to follow suit ..
|
||
@rpd.fire | 23 May 13 | |
@ ondafire - 23.05.13 - 08:18pm or should I say u thought it was a bad name because it wasnt their 64th console .. what about xbox360, why 360? not like it was there 360th console either .. Good point |
||
@cyberman | 23 May 13 | |
@ ondafire - 23.05.13 - 08:19pm seems just because Sony set the trend for the number after the name everyone obviously has to follow suit .. |
||
@trollulz | 23 May 13 | |
@ ondafire - 23.05.13 - 08:18pm or should I say u thought it was a bad name because it wasnt their 64th console .. what about xbox360, why 360? not like it was there 360th console either .. the N64 was named like that because it had 64 bit graphics. Like TurboGrafx 16, 16 bit graphics. Dumbass |
||
@cyberman | 23 May 13 | |
aint he bein sarcastic?
|
||
@trollulz | 23 May 13 | |
whats idiotic about that?
|
||
@ondafire | 24 May 13 | |
like I didnt know that. someone needs to understand humor.
|
||
@xtreme83 | 24 May 13 | |
Does it come with a matching toaster?
|
||
@spartan2 | 24 May 13 | |
Why bother adding one. Just call it xbox. That's all I am gonna do. Microsoft fumble the name, least of their worries
|
||
@ondafire | 24 May 13 | |
oh I agree not the best of names. they did explain the one part of the name. All in one and all that cr*p. which would be why they spelt in as one and not used the number 1.
|
||