Page #: 3/11 |
@norega | 27 February 16 | |
@ dan27notts - 27.02.16 - 08:03pm Are you sure, i dont remember Russia using them during the cold war. North Korea can pretend they arent afraid but they arent stupid, they know the true consequences if they got anywhere near having the capability to launch a nuclear weapon At the moment korea is not a threat but 20 years time they could have megaton weapons and the missiles to carry them . Once a ballistic missle is in orbit its virtually impossible to shoot down as the warhead travels at 30 thousand miles per hour on re entry .No missle can shoot it down |
||
@moplady | 27 February 16 | |
So fk nuckes, get rid of them, have them Or not they won't protect us, if nuke war was to break out, we will all go together when we go so to speek, so in the mean time why don't we use all that money for I Previously said, we want to keep are Drs so pay them proper wages, don't let them go to other county's then we get foreign Drs that will work in are NHS for less wages ect, the money can go in very good and very important cruises I say |
||
@moplady | 27 February 16 | |
|
||
@usbcable | 27 February 16 | |
Where was the protest?
|
||
@norega | 27 February 16 | |
The idea of these weapons is to prevent the other side from using them . If the H bomb wasnt developed after ww2 then Europe would probably still be a war zone . These weapons are needed now more than ever , We have terroist funding country's like Pakistan that have a big stockpile of nukes and cant even keep nuclear fuel under lock and key .
|
||
@sunwun | 27 February 16 | |
Every form of energy can be used in either of 2 ways - constructive and destructive including nuclear energy. Nuclear weapons are simply one step ahead of the processing for generating nuclear powered electricy. I believe the groups of countries that negotiated the Iran Nuclear deal and advices iran to make constructive use of it, should set a good example including the UK.
|
||
@laity | 27 February 16 | |
Nuclear weapons can't be used against countries that don't possess them.. so then you're spending all of this money on a weapon, for what? You can either attack a country in a rage, signalling the fall of your own country, or you can retaliate against an aggressor.. in which case, the nuclear deterrent didn't do much of a good job at deterring the attack.. in the current climate, strong ground and air forces make much more sense..
|
||
@norega | 27 February 16 | |
Our armed forces is so small now that it would be destroyed in a few days by russia .The nukes prevent this from happening as they know full well that we would retaliate as a last resort . Without them we would have no defence
|
||
@funphy | 27 February 16 | |
We're all fked either way, so... Pint anyone? |
||
@sunwun | 27 February 16 | |
Most too expensive scientific researches are pure nonsense that may never benifit anyone in their lifetime. The protest is justified provided its not politically initiated and motivated.
|
||