You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please
|
@newt182 | |
|
Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group generally unreliable. The move is highly unusual for the online encyclopaedia, which rarely puts in place a blanket ban on publications and which still allows links to sources such as Kremlin backed news organisation Russia Today, and Fox News, both of which have raised concern among editors. The editors described the arguments for a ban as centred on the Daily Mails reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website |
||
|
125
Replies
2490
Views
0 Favourites
|
||
Page #: 1/7 |  
|
|
|
@newt182 | 8 February 17 |
 Good. The dail fail is a trash 'newspaper'.
|
||
|
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 |
|
Yeah thats right, censor the press cause thats always done well in the past....
|
||
|
@ogdenz | 8 February 17 |
|
Good.
|
||
|
@say.what | 8 February 17 |
|
The nations best selling newspaper  I'm sure they're not bothered
|
||
|
@propidol | 8 February 17 |
|
The press isn't being censored by Wikileaks though. It's just not using it as source material due to it's lack of factual integrity.
|
||
|
|
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 |
|
Would you be saying good if they banned buzzfeed, cnn or the huffington post?
|
||
|
@bozzalad | 8 February 17 |
|
lol look at the fascists unite, scum
|
||
|
|
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 |
|
@ propidol - 8.02.17 - 09:59pm The press isn't being censored by Wikileaks though. It's just not using it as source material due to it's lack of factual integrity. Aka censoring it |
||
|
|
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 |
 |
||
|
|
@say.what | 8 February 17 |
|
@ bozzalad - 8.02.17 - 10:00pm lol look at the fascists unite, scum But it's delicious to watch 
|
||
|
|
@ogdenz | 8 February 17 |
|
@ dan27notts - 8.02.17 - 10:00pm Would you be saying good if they banned buzzfeed, cnn or the huffington post? I don't read those so I don't honestly know Dan. I have glanced at the Mail when I fancied a laugh. |
||
|
@ry.do | 8 February 17 |
|
I read the National Enquirer... It's a less sensationalist form of print media.
|
||
|
@obi_jon | 8 February 17 |
|
The Fail has always been a fake news rag.
|
||
|
|
@obi_jon | 8 February 17 |
 |
||
|
|
@bozzalad | 8 February 17 |
|
@ say.what - 8.02.17 - 10:04pm But it's delicious to watch more like pathetic |
||
|
|
@bozzalad | 8 February 17 |
|
@ dan27notts - 8.02.17 - 10:01pm there are loads of examples of outright lies from cnn, this is one of very many |
||
|
@piggle | 8 February 17 |
|
Like any newspaper gives factual info lol if one of them got it right it's because it was a lucky guess
|
||
|
|
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 |
|
@ ogdenz - 8.02.17 - 10:07pm I don't read those so I don't honestly know Dan. I have glanced at the Mail when I fancied a laugh. Its just a normal newspaper |
||
|
|
@piggle | 8 February 17 |
|
Still doesn't quite explain why people would run to the defense of the daily mail lol it is an atrocious paper
|
||
|
|
@bozzalad | 8 February 17 |
|
@ piggle - 8.02.17 - 10:21pm Like any newspaper gives factual info lol if one of them got it right it's because it was a lucky guess be nice to have news that stated the facts as they are and not just their opinions |
||
|
|
