well after u raised up abt the battle aqrabah, i think this sana'a case have a link to it, n i believe it has a link to it.

i also believed the sana'a manuscript that are used now by u to further more slander the Holy Quran is futile, n its very easy to prove after u bring up the aqrabah battle case especially. here is my conclusion:- they were done by False prophet Musaylama of Yamamah. what u think now northie? satisfied?

now why i say Musaylama is a False Prophet? the battle of Yamama actually, it is not battle of Aqrabah...happened just after Prophet Muhammad SAAW death. n Musaylamah is one of the Apostate that goes battling wth the Muslims at that time.

so, a false prophet should have false manuscript too dont u think that linked?

simple. end.

Who was musaylama worshipping kekasih?

What is futile about the sana'a mauscripts? Elaborate please.

he is an Apostate...that should tell u who he worshipped doesnt it northie? now to know who was Musaylama, googled this ''Musaylama of Yamamah ''. k northie...???

well perhaps it is a tool to further ruined Islamic belief that is Pure n brought by our Holy Prophet SAAW. its a tool to deceive...just like now, there are many tools of deceivements by certain people towards our Hadiths...but it seems sana'a manuscript had failed, hence it is kept only in the Attic n not being widely practised.

becuz our Holy Quran that are wth us now, is embraced by all muslims n not just kept as in written but also in their mind...n hearts...since more than 1400 yrs ago northie.