@baz92146 | ||
the validity of the poorer kz 3 scores,claiming that they may have deliberately downgraded the scores to get some attention to their articles. This appears to be based on their impressions of the demo |
||
187
Replies
4860
Views
0 Favourites
|
Page #: 1/19 |
@j.s.1983 | 9 February 11 | |
Oh scoring demos. Thats new *sarcasm* lol
|
||
@baz92146 | 9 February 11 | |
may not have worded that very well,gameinformer based it upon their playing the demo
|
||
@j.s.1983 | 9 February 11 | |
We used to have sum1 on here that gave scores to demos too.
|
||
@vamez86 | 9 February 11 | |
They are just but hurt at the review scores so they try to find excuses. The game probably s*cks for real
|
||
@baz92146 | 9 February 11 | |
why would gameinformer say that though?
|
||
@vamez86 | 9 February 11 | |
One will always have critics. These guys are probably thinking too much into it, so it leads them to this conclusion. KZ3 is a big game so it deserves a big score by everyone....that is not how it goes.
|
||
@play.con | 9 February 11 | |
Disappointed with the singleplayer demo....
|
||
@1fungus | 10 February 11 | |
the reason killzone3 is getting lower than expected scores is because reviewers did not think it was that great.no other reason,most reviews say single player is bland and boring,just like the last killzone.guess they read each others reviews eh?
|
||
@vamez86 | 10 February 11 | |
Too true. As i said, they are thinking too much into it.
|
||
@xvansx | 10 February 11 | |
downloading the single player demo now. dont trust what reviewers say about any game.
|
||