Page #: 413/442 |
@obi_jon | 24 October 17 | |
@ sisfreak2017 - 24.10.17 - 04:10am Tiangong-1 fu*kED gonna crash sooooooooooonish chinas Tiangong-1 spacestation is now fu*ked china space has lost contact and full control ages ago and accepted its demise. . . It ''MAY'' come crashing back down to Earth between October 2017 and April 2018 Yeah, I posted something about this in here last year, or whenever it was they admitted they'd lost control of it. The latest estimates based on it's rate of orbital decay are that it won't come down before April 2018. The Chinese are monitering it's orbit closely and have promised to raise the alarm when it starts to re-enter the earths atmosphere but we will only get a few hours notice when it does. It's orbital path means it could fall to earth absolutely anywhere between the latitudes of southern Spain and northern Australia, so anyone living to the north of Madrid or to the south of Alice Springs(roughly) should be safe but everyone else is at risk of having several tons of space junk falling on them. |
||
@obi_jon | 24 October 17 | |
@ obi_jon - 24.10.17 - 07:39am Yeah, I posted something about this in here last year, or whenever it was they admitted they'd lost control of it. The latest estimates based on it's rate of orbital decay are that it won't come down before April 2018. The Chinese are monitering it's orbit closely and have promised to raise the alarm when it starts to re-enter the earths atmosphere but we will only get a few hours notice when it does. It's orbital path means it could fall to earth absolutely anywhere between the latitudes of southern Spain and northern Australia, so anyone living to the north of Madrid or to the south of Alice Springs(roughly) should be safe but everyone else is at risk of having several tons of space junk falling on them. CORRECTION: It's actually between northern Spain and southern Australia, so it's anyone to the south of the Pyrenees and to the north of Tasmania/New Zealand's south island that could potentially be at risk. |
||
@shadow27 | 24 October 17 | |
It's the Chinese version of Skylab, I guess..
|
||
@obi_jon | 24 October 17 | |
@ shadow27 - 24.10.17 - 08:11am It's the Chinese version of Skylab, I guess.. Sort of, Skylab was a lot bigger at nearly 100tons, Tiangong-1 is only about 8.5tons and most of it will be burnt up on re-entry but some of it's heavier metalic components are expected to survive and hit the ground, or most likely the ocean somewhere, the chances of Tiangong-1 hitting land are about the same as they were for Skylab, which did, or any other uncontrolled re-entry, most of which don't. The chances of it actually hitting a human being, or even just damaging a building/property, are incredibly small. If someone was lucky enough to be underneath, or within normal viewing distances, of it's regular flightpath(most good satellite-tracking sites will show it's location in real time) whilst it's re-entering could get a pretty spectacular firework display as it starts burning up overhead. |
||
@shadow27 | 28 October 17 | |
Matter/antimatter, the hunt for assymetry continues: The universe shouldn't exist, according to new ultra-precise measurements of anti-protons. The universe is the embodiment of an epic battle between matter and antimatter that occurred immediately after the Big Bang, 13.82 billion years ago. Evidently, matter won - because there are galaxies, stars, planets etc buthowmatter won is one of the biggest mysteries hanging over physics. |
||
@shadow27 | 28 October 17 | |
It is predicted that equal amounts of matter and antimatter were produced in the primordial universe (a basic prediction by the Standard Model of physics), but if that's the case, all matter in the universe should have been annihilated when it came into contact with its antimatter counterpart - a Big Bang followed by a big disappointment. This physics conundrum focuses on the idea that all particles have their antimatter twin with the same quantum numbers, only the exact opposite. Protons have anti-protons, electrons have positrons, neutrinos have anti-neutrinos etc.; a beautiful example of symmetry in the quantum world. But should one of these quantum numbers be very slightly different between matter and antimatter particles, it might explain why matter became the dominant ''stuff'' of the universe. |
||
@shadow27 | 28 October 17 | |
So, in an attempt to measure one of the quantum states of particles, physicists of CERN's Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment , located near Geneva, Switzerland, have made the most precise measurement of the anti-proton's magnetic moment. BASE is a complex piece of hardware that can precisely measure the magnetic moments of protons and anti-protons in an attempt to detect an extremely small difference between the two. Should there be a difference, this might explain why matter is more dominant than antimatter. However, this latest measurement of the magnetic moment of anti-protons has revealed that the magnetic moments of both protons and anti-protons are exactly the same to a record-breaking level of precision. In fact, the anti-proton measurement is even more precise than our measurements of the magnetic moment of a proton - a stunning feat considering how difficult anti-protons are to study. |
||
@sisfreak2017 | 28 October 17 | |
jeez thinking about all that stuffs makes ones bonse hurt are we all and everything else that exists just a dream in somethings mind ??? , and where did that something come from. . And people's still believe in their fairytale madeup gods. |
||
@shadow27 | 28 October 17 | |
''It is probably the first time that physicists get a more precise measurement for antimatter than for matter, which demonstrates the extraordinary progress accomplished at CERN's Antiproton Decelerator,'' said physicist Christian Smorrain a CERN statement. TheAntiproton Decelerator is a machine that can capture antiparticles (created from particle collisions that occur atCERNs Proton Synchrotron) and funnel them to other experiments, like BASE. (They got a more precise measurement of antimatter than they could with matter.. idk that just seems odd to me. Like looking in a mirror and it allows you to see more. Some really creepy ''Prince of Darkness'' sh*t they are messing around with here) |
||
@jayna | 28 October 17 | |
I watched a video on YouTube bout the destruction of the planet earth through nuclear bombing. Is this possible that our planet and all its habitants could be wiped out of this universe for ever.
|
||