Page #: 2/3 |
@urvoice1 | 4 October 13 | |
she's 43, she will never give birth again. 15 years for the childs life may seem short change, would you rather she was stoned to death ?
|
||
@vicky35 | 4 October 13 | |
she should be locked up for life!!
|
||
@jjps | 4 October 13 | |
stop being dramatic... she deserved a life sentence...
|
||
@sillyxx | 5 October 13 | |
Fkin disgusting!
|
||
@urvoice1 | 5 October 13 | |
she isn't a danger to the general public. she won't let you starve to death in your cot. who's being dramatic ?
|
||
@madam.x | 5 October 13 | |
I don't think its overly dramatic to say that 15 years isn't an apt punishment. I really don't care if she's a danger to the public. What counts is that she was a huge danger to her child.
|
||
@sillyxx | 5 October 13 | |
She get 15years and will probably serve less and get to live her life which is more than that poor innocent child got to do! It really does wind me up, they don't deserve to have another day of freedom before they die, they should be locked up with the bare minimum and think about what they have done!
|
||
@oligarch | 5 October 13 | |
flush her like a turd and focus on a child who is in danger right as i'm typing these letters
|
||
@berk | 5 October 13 | |
I can't even read about it, it's just incomprehensible
|
||
@berk | 5 October 13 | |
@ urvoice1 - 4.10.13 - 11:37pm she's 43, she will never give birth again. 15 years for the childs life may seem short change, would you rather she was stoned to death ? Yes! |
||