Page #: 51/59 |
@bozzalad | 20 May 19 | |
@ obi_jon - 20.05.19 - 05:59pm I don't for one minute believe that it is possible for a pregnant women to legally abort a healthy baby at 9months. that's because you don't care enough to find out |
||
@kimjongl | 20 May 19 | |
@ piggle - 20.05.19 - 05:47pm Some girl giving the green light for a guy to chuck loads up them doesn't mean they should. There is nothing a woman can say or do to make that happen. Considering the male part is the only absolute in manifesting a pregnancy, it's a choice even more important than any precaution a female can take. So you're putting more responsibility on the man for some reason. Sperm can do nothing without an egg so it's not true it is the only thing that can cause pregnancy. Just because a man wants to do it doesn't mean a woman should say yes. There is nothing a man can do to make that happen unless it's r*pe. Considering only women get pregnant the choice of prevention by them is the most important factor. In most cases it's a shared responsibility. |
||
@kimjongl | 20 May 19 | |
@ obi_jon - 20.05.19 - 05:59pm I don't for one minute believe that it is possible for a pregnant women to legally abort a healthy baby at 9months. But it should be, don't you agree? Any laws preventing this harm a women's right to choose. |
||
@recurve16 | 20 May 19 | |
8 States Now Allow Killing Babies Up to Birth After New York Legalized All Abortions New Yorks new pro-abortion law has drawn outrage from all across the country. It strips away all legal protections for unborn babies and allows them to be aborted for basically any reason up to birth. But New York is not alone. Seven other states also allow unborn babies to be aborted through all nine months of pregnancy and have done so for years,the Christian Post reports. The states are Alaska, Colorado, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont, along with Washington, D.C. This fact is confirmed by the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion research group and former arm of Planned Parenthood. For Obi's benefit, no idea how legit it is, feel free to research... |
||
@piggle | 20 May 19 | |
@ kimjongl - 20.05.19 - 06:12pm So you're putting more responsibility on the man for some reason. Sperm can do nothing without an egg so it's not true it is the only thing that can cause pregnancy. Just because a man wants to do it doesn't mean a woman should say yes. There is nothing a man can do to make that happen unless it's r*pe. Considering only women get pregnant the choice of prevention by them is the most important factor. In most cases it's a shared responsibility. Yeah no sh*t it can't happen without an egg so keep that sh*t away from them. Sperm is mobile, controllable and always fertile. There's failed contraceptive babies all over the shop, aint no chose not spunk up her babes tho |
||
@bozzalad | 20 May 19 | |
@ slwnoris - 20.05.19 - 06:11pm I hate that term knocked up, I've never been aware of any woman carrying a baby for 9 months, then getting it aborted why? Because at nine months the baby is fully formed and no doctor would do such a thing, as for men who father a child then walk away I find are a total disgrace. Those men who take advantage of women when there drunk are also beneath concept to. And yes I am very old fashioned when it comes to women. You are not old fashioned when it come to women Just thick Next you will be telling me that no women are deliberately making their unborn child be born with a disability for the extra benefits |
||
@kimjongl | 20 May 19 | |
@ piggle - 20.05.19 - 06:18pm Yeah no sh*t it can't happen without an egg so keep that sh*t away from them. Sperm is mobile, controllable and always fertile. There's failed contraceptive babies all over the shop, aint no chose not spunk up her babes tho And those women certainly didn't choose to keep their legs shut. If anything women have more responsibility if you think about it since only they can get pregnant. They have more responsibility to themselves, because it's much easier for the man to walk away. There's really no need for him to have any responsibility. |
||
@bozzalad | 20 May 19 | |
@ recurve16 - 20.05.19 - 06:16pm 8 States Now Allow Killing Babies Up to Birth After New York Legalized All Abortions New Yorks new pro-abortion law has drawn outrage from all across the country. It strips away all legal protections for unborn babies and allows them to be aborted for basically any reason up to birth. But New York is not alone. Seven other states also allow unborn babies to be aborted through all nine months of pregnancy and have done so for years,the Christian Post reports. The states are Alaska, Colorado, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont, along with Washington, D.C. This fact is confirmed by the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion research group and former arm of Planned Parenthood. For Obi's benefit, no idea how legit it is, feel free to research... He doesn't wanna know |
||
@obi_jon | 20 May 19 | |
@ recurve16 - 20.05.19 - 06:16pm 8 States Now Allow Killing Babies Up to Birth After New York Legalized All Abortions New Yorks new pro-abortion law has drawn outrage from all across the country. It strips away all legal protections for unborn babies and allows them to be aborted for basically any reason up to birth. But New York is not alone. Seven other states also allow unborn babies to be aborted through all nine months of pregnancy and have done so for years,the Christian Post reports. The states are Alaska, Colorado, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont, along with Washington, D.C. This fact is confirmed by the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion research group and former arm of Planned Parenthood. For Obi's benefit, no idea how legit it is, feel free to research... ''The Christian Post reports''. Well I'm sure they're completely neutral and unbiased on the issue. Jesus fucking wept. /s Third trimester abortions are allowed in those states ONLY under very specific circumstances. Namely when the unborn is unviable and stands no chance of survival if delivered and/or when the mother's life is in mortal danger and there is no medically viable alternative. |
||
@kimjongl | 20 May 19 | |
But what about her right to choose? There can't be a right if there are conditions put on it.
|
||