@newt182 | ||
Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group generally unreliable. The move is highly unusual for the online encyclopaedia, which rarely puts in place a blanket ban on publications and which still allows links to sources such as Kremlin backed news organisation Russia Today, and Fox News, both of which have raised concern among editors. The editors described the arguments for a ban as centred on the Daily Mails reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website |
||
125
Replies
2426
Views
0 Favourites
|
Page #: 1/13 |
@newt182 | 8 February 17 | |
Good. The dail fail is a trash 'newspaper'.
|
||
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 | |
Yeah thats right, censor the press cause thats always done well in the past....
|
||
@ogdenz | 8 February 17 | |
Good.
|
||
@say.what | 8 February 17 | |
The nations best selling newspaper I'm sure they're not bothered
|
||
@propidol | 8 February 17 | |
The press isn't being censored by Wikileaks though. It's just not using it as source material due to it's lack of factual integrity.
|
||
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 | |
Would you be saying good if they banned buzzfeed, cnn or the huffington post?
|
||
@bozzalad | 8 February 17 | |
lol look at the fascists unite, scum
|
||
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 | |
@ propidol - 8.02.17 - 09:59pm The press isn't being censored by Wikileaks though. It's just not using it as source material due to it's lack of factual integrity. Aka censoring it |
||
@dan27notts | 8 February 17 | |
@say.what | 8 February 17 | |
@ bozzalad - 8.02.17 - 10:00pm lol look at the fascists unite, scum But it's delicious to watch |
||