Page #: 318/659 |
@bozzalad | 1 June 17 | |
@ say.what - 1.06.17 - 09:17pm On the radio they said they have pulled out so they can renegotiate more favorable terms for America... Surely that has to be a good thing... Especially if you are an American you just know how the msm will portray it, category 6 hurricanes yellowstone erupting etc would cause less damage than this |
||
@terrydactyl | 1 June 17 | |
So much stupid in this topic re climate change.
|
||
@obi_jon | 1 June 17 | |
I notice he briefly mentioned the legal responsibilities the US faced under the Paris agreement. My guess is it's the shirking of those legal responsibilities which is more than likely the real reason they've withdrawn, as they were highly unlikely to have met their previously agreed upon emissions reductions. Trump has a long history of shirking legal responsibility.
|
||
@bozzalad | 1 June 17 | |
@ bozzalad - 1.06.17 - 08:33pm David Beckham and other celebrities lose 700m tax case They were among more than 1,000 people who invested in the Ingenious film financing schemes in the hope of securing tax relief. Ingenious, which helped produce movies including Avatar, qualified for tax breaks designed to support the UK film industry. But HMRC said Ingenious claimed relief on artificial losses from its films. That meant the schemes were not legitimate investment opportunities but actually a means of avoiding tax. On Wednesday, a tax tribunal upheld a 2016 decision to recoup the avoided tax, ruling that the incentives were not allowable deductions. It means that 1,400 people - including celebrities such as Gary Lineker, Bob Geldof and Ant and Dec - now face big bills. Some 420m of tax was avoided, but with interest included the total owed will be closer to 700m. An HMRC spokesperson said: We are pleased that the tribunal has agreed with us that the vast majority of what was claimed in tax relief by Ingenious investors was simply not due. seems they are gonna appeal |
||
@bozzalad | 1 June 17 | |
@ obi_jon - 1.06.17 - 10:00pm I notice he briefly mentioned the legal responsibilities the US faced under the Paris agreement. My guess is it's the shirking of those legal responsibilities which is more than likely the real reason they've withdrawn, as they were highly unlikely to have met their previously agreed upon emissions reductions. Trump has a long history of shirking legal responsibility. yes because because trump caused all the pollution n problems in the last 100 n odd days |
||
@1clivey1 | 2 June 17 | |
so he's pulled out of the paris agreement! shame on him climate change is important!
|
||
@dunkz | 2 June 17 | |
*
probably cause there is no money to be made in climate change as we really cant control the the climate anyways lol
|
||
@dunkz | 2 June 17 | |
@obi_jon | 2 June 17 | |
@obi_jon | 2 June 17 | |
Trump: ''I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.'' Bill Blasio(mayor of Pittsburgh): ''Fact: Hillary Clinton received 80'/. of the vote in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh stands with the world and will follow Paris Agreement.'' |
||