Page #: 15/61 |
@mz.c | 11 December 17 | |
@ dodgey - 11.12.17 - 03:16pm When u see something like that you say I HOPE NOBODY DIED. Of course someone would have been injured in that. People got injured but thankfully nobody died. Luckily nobody was killed but they have lost everything |
||
@0gypsy0 | 11 December 17 | |
@ dodgey - 11.12.17 - 03:16pm When u see something like that you say I HOPE NOBODY DIED. Of course someone would have been injured in that. People got injured but thankfully nobody died. Thanks for not trying to hit me with the shovel again, look who is teaching me what to say, lol |
||
@dodgey | 11 December 17 | |
@ mz.c - 11.12.17 - 03:18pm Luckily nobody was killed but they have lost everything Yes its very bad. |
||
@dodgey | 11 December 17 | |
@ 0gypsy0 - 11.12.17 - 03:19pm Thanks for not trying to hit me with the shovel again, look who is teaching me what to say, lol Maybe if i did it might knock some sense into that balloon head of yours. |
||
@0gypsy0 | 11 December 17 | |
@ dodgey - 11.12.17 - 03:20pm Maybe if i did it might knock some sense into that balloon head of yours. That's not how you should talk mr self proclaimed polite and i edited my comment you low life pr*ck |
||
@musho77 | 11 December 17 | |
you sure that photo isnt the gurnos estate in merthyr tydfil , no explotion thats how it looks everyday
|
||
@obi_jon | 11 December 17 | |
@ dodgey - 11.12.17 - 02:54pm If the heating has packed up then fair enough but most of the schools are shut because teachers cant be bothered going out in the snow. And thats a fact. No it's not you bellend, it's a legal issue. The schools are legally responsible for ensuring the safety of their pupils on school property, so when the weather presents a safety hazard to the pupils in their care, they are left with no option but to close or risk being liable for any injuries/accidents. Because they have severely limited budgets, it means they simply can't risk being sued by the parents of some kid who slips on the ice and breaks their leg or cracks their head open etc. I'm not sure but they may even be liable for accidents happening whilst travelling to the school on a schoolbus. Imagine if a bus full of kids on their way to school crashed due on icey roads and kids were killed or injured. People would certainly be asking questions as to wether those kids were put in undue danger by insisting that they travel in adverse weather conditions. |
||
@sisfreak2017 | 11 December 17 | |
@birdy | 11 December 17 | |
Bunch of slackers. Time to bust out the sled and malamutes.
|
||
@dodgey | 11 December 17 | |
@ obi_jon - 11.12.17 - 04:31pm No it's not you bellend, it's a legal issue. The schools are legally responsible for ensuring the safety of their pupils on school property, so when the weather presents a safety hazard to the pupils in their care, they are left with no option but to close or risk being liable for any injuries/accidents. Because they have severely limited budgets, it means they simply can't risk being sued by the parents of some kid who slips on the ice and breaks their leg or cracks their head open etc. I'm not sure but they may even be liable for accidents happening whilst travelling to the school on a schoolbus. Imagine if a bus full of kids on their way to school crashed due on icey roads and kids were killed or injured. People would certainly be asking questions as to wether those kids were put in undue danger by insisting that they travel in adverse weather conditions. You do know buses can crash any time of the year nah its due to teachers unions giving teachers extra time off. Dont they already get enough holidays? My god they are off work more than they are in work. |
||