@9362 | ||
So the iaaf has ruled that she has to take drugs to reduce her testosterone levels in order that she can still complete in Athletics events. Is this right? I really don't know |
||
106
Replies
2359
Views
2 Favourites
|
Page #: 1/11 |
@dodgey | 1 May 19 | |
I really don't care
|
||
@mikeymk | 1 May 19 | |
She's a natural female with a natural condition. To suggest penalty would be to suggest penalising a basketball player because he's taller than the other players. Regulating the form of athletes is absolute madness, and no result can be valid when the athlete's form has been restricted. |
||
@3mel | 1 May 19 | |
*remembers Fatima Whitbread
|
||
@kimjongl | 1 May 19 | |
It's ridiculous, whatever advantage she has occurs naturally. Yet in other cases actual men are now being allowed to compete in women's sport. There's something dystopian about being forced to take drugs that alter your natural state. |
||
@wakeup4 | 1 May 19 | |
Great decision if shes a bloke
|
||
@piggle | 1 May 19 | |
@ kipling - 1.05.19 - 02:21pm Just cause she resembles a male , they're being unfair with the athlete ... If she has a fanny , she's a female , simple as that It's not. |
||
@deusexmachina | 1 May 19 | |
Swimmers with big feet should have their toes cut off.
|
||
@mikeymk | 1 May 19 | |
@ wakeup4 - 1.05.19 - 02:25pm Great decision if shes a bloke She's not. |
||
@mikeymk | 1 May 19 | |
@ piggle - 1.05.19 - 02:29pm It's not. It is. |
||
@wakeup4 | 1 May 19 | |
@ mikeymk - 1.05.19 - 03:03pm She's not. I think someone needs to check |
||