Page #: 2/3 |
@3mel | 29 July 19 | |
@ mikeymk - 29.07.19 - 01:56am Right. So if someone is caught with a bit of weed, should they be locked up for a crack-fuelled murdering spree - just because some guy says weed is a 'gateway'..? If I have a car-chase video on my phone, should I be locked up for running down a load of pedestrians? The argument you're putting forward, which has been spun by a tabloid, is ridiculous. If someone is guilty of having a picture of a naked child, that's all they're guilty of. And they should be dealt with accordingly. Unsurprisingly, such a person isn't going to be treated the same as someone who rapes a child. That's not really news, is it. it's a separate offence, possession indecent images of a child. if it's a pic a family member sent you of little Timmy in the bath it shouldn't (in a sane world) be treated as CP. the opposite end of the spectrum is pictures of children being abused. the name paedophile doesn't refer to a committed act but to that disposition. if you've got that stuff on your computer, that's what you are and you should see jail. |
||
@mikeymk | 29 July 19 | |
Would it not make sense then, that the varying levels of what constitutes as CP coincides with the varying levels of sentencing..?
|
||
@birdy | 29 July 19 | |
Paedophilia isn't illegal, acting on it is. CP is illegal though, so having those images on your device is also illegal, as you are engaging in it. I think it's fair to say indecent images of children are a little different to a car chase.
|
||
@birdy | 29 July 19 | |
I don't think anyone cares about varying degrees of anything when it comes to crimes against children.
|
||
@sisfreak2017 | 29 July 19 | |
Some of these fks claim they've accidentally viewed the images , perhaps that could occur if followed a blind link but often their search history shows theyve actively sourced it.
|
||
@obi_jon | 29 July 19 | |
@ sisfreak2017 - 29.07.19 - 02:34am Some of these fks claim they've accidentally viewed the images , perhaps that could occur if followed a blind link but often their search history shows theyve actively sourced it. There are also documented cases of CP images being installed on devices maliciously, by viruses and other methods, for the express purposes of blackmailing/extortion and/or framing someone to discredit/disgrace them. Pretty much everyone hates a paedophile, so smearing and false accusations of such have sadly now become commonplace. I personally have been both directly accused and had insinuations made against me, of both being a paedophile myself and/or supporting/apologising for them, in precisely this maliciously accusatory manner, on more than 1 occasion here on pro. Also, some of the people professing how much they hate and detest paedophiles are often simply using it as a cover or mask for their own criminal/scumbag behaviours. Drug dealers and/or violent thugs/petty criminals mainly. Their aim is to distract from their own scumbag behaviours by pointing towards the even lowlier lowlifes. Like Big Tony(no, not Tranie) and his coke head mates who make a fortune dealing drugs to the kids on the estates but then go online to big themselves up by telling everyone how they really hates them paedos, so they're like the good guys really... honestly guv. And anyone who says a word against them is automatically labelled as being a 'nonce lover'. Of course, this is exactly what little Tommeh gobsh*te and his fanboys(like Big Tony and his mates) are doing. |
||
@obi_jon | 29 July 19 | |
@obi_jon | 29 July 19 | |
@mikeymk | 29 July 19 | |
Yep, because they'll shamelessly sell and push anything and everything, take whatever mundane fodder available, twist it and sensationalise it, cos they know how to get you to buy into it.
|
||
@bozzalad | 29 July 19 | |
@ obi_jon - 29.07.19 - 10:02am There are also documented cases of CP images being installed on devices maliciously, by viruses and other methods, for the express purposes of blackmailing/extortion and/or framing someone to discredit/disgrace them. Pretty much everyone hates a paedophile, so smearing and false accusations of such have sadly now become commonplace. I personally have been both directly accused and had insinuations made against me, of both being a paedophile myself and/or supporting/apologising for them, in precisely this maliciously accusatory manner, on more than 1 occasion here on pro. Also, some of the people professing how much they hate and detest paedophiles are often simply using it as a cover or mask for their own criminal/scumbag behaviours. Drug dealers and/or violent thugs/petty criminals mainly. Their aim is to distract from their own scumbag behaviours by pointing towards the even lowlier lowlifes. Like Big Tony(no, not Tranie) and his coke head mates who make a fortune dealing drugs to the kids on the estates but then go online to big themselves up by telling everyone how they really hates them paedos, so they're like the good guys really... honestly guv. And anyone who says a word against them is automatically labelled as being a 'nonce lover'. Of course, this is exactly what little Tommeh gobsh*te and his fanboys(like Big Tony and his mates) are doing. Believe it or not this topic isn't about you, but as you chosen to make it so, you are a paedophile appeaser every single time muslims r*pe gangs are mentioned you have a rant about christians . As for your fake newspaper picture you keep posting why don't you look at what is going on, thousands of kids r*ped tortured some murdered covered up and aided by those meant to help them. Then silenced by scu m like naz shah and you who think they should just shut up and go away, because you can't stand the truth of what is being said so it shouldn't be said at all. You got a rant on about an old woman having an opinion you got a bigger rant on about a slapper sh*gging another slapper but when it comes to these kids who have suffered possibly the worst race hate crimes in the uk your response is ''yeah but christians' You couldn't give less of a fig about those kids if you tried. I truly do pity you. |
||