Page #: 52/59 |
@bozzalad | 20 May 19 | |
@ obi_jon - 20.05.19 - 06:53pm ''The Christian Post reports''. Well I'm sure they're completely neutral and unbiased on the issue. Jesus fucking wept. /s Third trimester abortions are allowed in those states ONLY under very specific circumstances. Namely when the unborn is unviable and stands no chance of survival if delivered and/or when the mother's life is in mortal danger and there is no medically viable alternative. Again, liar |
||
@s4n | 20 May 19 | |
I'm against it, wrong or right, I donno.
|
||
@iilmadme | 20 May 19 | |
I think it's perfectly human to have partial views about this,to see different degrees of right and wrong.we are all hypocrites.but what can you do? The idea of a woman having to carry her r*pist's child is appalling.what are the chances of her harming herself? Not all danger to the mother is physical.but i cant hand on heart say that abortion is ever 'ok'.of course it's not fine.neither is life
|
||
@piggle | 20 May 19 | |
@ kimjongl - 20.05.19 - 06:22pm And those women certainly didn't choose to keep their legs shut. If anything women have more responsibility if you think about it since only they can get pregnant. They have more responsibility to themselves, because it's much easier for the man to walk away. There's really no need for him to have any responsibility. Really begs the question why he'd further choose to combat irresponsibility by unleashing something so precious on someone so un-prohibitive? Sex does not and never should solely revolve around the male org*sm. The only part in the whole act that carries risk |
||
@piggle | 20 May 19 | |
@ bozzalad - 20.05.19 - 07:00pm Again, liar Even outside the 24 week window for an abortion, New York state law allows a mother to get an abortion if terminating the pregnancy is necessary to preserve the mother's health or if the fetus isn't viable. source https |
||
@bozzalad | 20 May 19 | |
@ piggle - 20.05.19 - 09:11pm Even outside the 24 week window for an abortion, New York state law allows a mother to get an abortion if terminating the pregnancy is necessary to preserve the mother's health or if the fetus isn't viable. source https unless the fetus isn't viable or the abortion is necessary to protect the mother's health. not physical health only the aim is , https |
||
@bozzalad | 20 May 19 | |
@ slwnoris - 20.05.19 - 08:21pm Do they, how? If they do then there evil. drinking alcohol for one |
||
@kimjongl | 20 May 19 | |
@ piggle - 20.05.19 - 09:05pm Really begs the question why he'd further choose to combat irresponsibility by unleashing something so precious on someone so un-prohibitive? Sex does not and never should solely revolve around the male org*sm. The only part in the whole act that carries risk The only part that carries the risk is the woman's desire for sex because she's the only one that can carry the baby. Only the woman is really engaging in risky and irresponsible behaviour. |
||
@piggle | 20 May 19 | |
@piggle | 20 May 19 | |
@ kimjongl - 20.05.19 - 10:00pm The only part that carries the risk is the woman's desire for sex because she's the only one that can carry the baby. Only the woman is really engaging in risky and irresponsible behaviour. Sex does not revolve around or even require the male org*sm |
||