shia muslim of true islam?
To be honest, Muhammad s.a.w the Prophet of Islam was not shia, btw.

I prefer Shia Islam tbh

Ali was related and one of the first to embrace Islam so that makes him the more permissible Caliph.

A few months before his death, the Islamic prophet Muhammad delivered a sermon to over 100,000 Muslims at the event of Ghadir Khumm. In the sermon, he declared Ali ibn Abi Talib to be his successor. He described Ali with several leadership titles in the sermon, including ''Mawla,'' ''Imam,'' ''Ameer,'' and ''Khalifah.'' After the sermon, Muhammad instructed everyone to pledge allegiance to Ali. According to both Shia and Sunni sources, Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman were all among those who pledged allegiance to Ali at the event.

After Muhammad's death, however, some of Muhammad's companions left and gathered at a place known as Saqifa. At Saqifa, Umar pledged allegiance to Abu Bakr, despite their previous pledges of allegiance to Ali. Abu Bakr then assumed political power, and his supporters became known as the Sunnis. Despite that, a group of Muslims kept their allegiance to Ali. These people, who became known as Shias, held that while Ali's right to be the political leader may have been taken, he was still the religious and spiritual leader after Muhammad.

See! Shia Islam is true Islam!

Later, wasn't there a period of civil wars fought by the Sunnis against the 'Shias'?
It's still manifesting to this day.
People think of all the mosques being bombed by fellow Muslims and think it's ridiculous but this is mostly sectarian. Sunnis killing Shias and Shias retaliating.

I haven't read all Your statments here..
Let me tell You a fact.
You will find hundred thousands of Muslims that are Pure SUNNI, all of them remembering the HOLY QURAAN by heart, but you wont find a single shia who can do this. A shia cannot and wont remember the whole Quraan for long due to the wrath (on them), they are bad mouthed towards Shaba the companion of MUHAMMAD S.A W.

actually disputing shia and sunni is nonsense.No disputing among sahabah.those are continuing of old rival betwen bani hashim and bani umayah as political competing in mecca long time ago before prophet muhamad born.

But who ever is bad mouthed today towards Sahaba and Ummahat-ul-mo'mineen (any one among the Wives of Muhammad S.A.W) will remain deprived of remembering the whole Quraan by heart even today. And if by chance some1 shia remember it by heart (accidentally), at the time of death he/she wont remember it any more.
This is a live fact (miracle) today, no one can deny it.

Dear Trunking,
It is a good thing that you do research on this. However, to be balanced, you should read from both sides...
The hadith of Ghadir Khum does not declare Ali as a Khalifah or sucessor after prophet death. It declares him as Mawla, which I believe no one would oppose this. Mawla means one with regarded position and could mean a leader.
Secondly, suppose people at that time already know who is the khalifah/successor, do you think any one (including Abu bakr and Omar) may even dare to oppose what their prophet said? Do not they know this will get them accursed?
I just recommend more in-depth balanced research, which will guide us to the truth..