Page #: 7/7 |
@silverjx | 28 September 12 | |
Thats what i said and the 'unreasonable doubt' thing, which alot of people are finding it hard to understand, to me can't really say if he is or isn't but using arguments like the court found him not guilty is been weak, tell some people a footballer got found not guilty its fine but the same people will be up in arms with a normal case let off on a tech
|
||
@piaggio | 28 September 12 | |
we have spoken bout this silver.beyond reasonable doubt sounds good to me.
|
||
@silverjx | 28 September 12 | |
reassuring for r*pe victims...shouldn't really have put that in a footballer and been to court thread
|
||
@piaggio | 28 September 12 | |
the thing is silver jt got tried twice guilty once.thats more than wot happened to suarez.a bit of balance would be ok
|
||
@cantona | 28 September 12 | |
So the CPS should prosecute Suarez just to acquit him? Excellent ise of taxpayers money there
|
||
@piaggio | 28 September 12 | |
no cantona i didnt mean prosecute suarez in criminal justice court.why they did it to jt is the imbalance am stating
|
||
@cantona | 28 September 12 | |
A member of the public hadn't complained there would have been no case.
|
||
@silverjx | 28 September 12 | |
They check on worthwhile anyway and nothings more worthwhile then building a case that cost thousands against a South American who could just skip the country come transfer window time
|
||
@silverjx | 28 September 12 | |
No comment .....
|
||
@nspacka | 29 September 12 | |
I guess JT cares about his image that is why he runs around sh*gging his mate's birds
|
||