Page #: 4/6 |
@3mel | 27 July 17 | |
@ gtr1 - 27.07.17 - 06:05am I cant believe am back here 10yrs later and still arguing Nokia vs Sony. Lol anyway I am aware of all of s60s 'features'. Almost all Wat u mention were half baked or complete gimmicks. I mean do u know anyone that seriously runs a web server off a phone???? If you looked at the s60 forum then with all the issues Symbian had you wud see that on a day to day level almost everyone was better off with a simple Java phone. with all the issues that existed not once did anyone say fu*k this I'm going over Java handsets, not once. why is that you ask, because it's a night and day comparison. I'll take crail's word for it combined with the fact that your even trying to argue the point... |
||
@crail | 27 July 17 | |
@ gtr1 - 27.07.17 - 06:44am Business and corporate users can even argue that Blackberry was the best. It was the first phone to put email in your pocket and then there was BBm. Blackberry even tho it was not glamorous helped me start a successful business. See as you clearly don't know much about s60. It was the first to put email in your pocket |
||
@gtr1 | 27 July 17 | |
I for one kept my Java phone as primary device even tho I had 2 Symbian phones after it and a wm 6.1 device. I know alot more ppl that went to Java for simplicity and reliability especially people who need a phone for productivity. I only found a replacement for my k750i when I moved to blackberry and I didn't make the move till blackberry was 3g enabled so I cud make the most of bis.
|
||
@gtr1 | 27 July 17 | |
Crail I had email in my pocket with the k750i and it worked similar to the Symbian. Blackberry on the other hand made email easier with encryption so that corporate workers cud use it. S60 never was recognised the way blackberry was for business use
|
||
@gtr1 | 27 July 17 | |
And bb was also safer. BBm again was the only instant messaging that worked for business and government. S60 was just a gimmicky toy in comparison.
|
||
@gtr1 | 27 July 17 | |
U guys still havnt answered my question about who wud seriously use a phone as a web server. That alone shows Wat ridiculous lengths s60 fan boys go to to make it look good.
|
||
@3mel | 27 July 17 | |
Dani2xll did at some stage, but that's beside the point. it's the fact that it was capable of almost anything you could think of and was designed to be so. if you didn't understand that back then there's little point trying to make you see it now. |
||
@gtr1 | 27 July 17 | |
So we all agree S60 was designed to do alot of gimmicky tasks. Things nobody even wants to do today on a phone. Blackberry on the other hand really put secure email in users pockets making it a serious tool even for presidents. Apple gave us a true smartphone with iPhone 1. It made gaming really good on a phone for the first time. And well Android just made having an OS in a phone a normal thing.
|
||
@3mel | 27 July 17 | |
no I doubt anyone agrees with that.
|
||
@gtr1 | 28 July 17 | |
Most people do. Lol that's why Symbian is dead and buried now with Android and IOS dominating business and personal market. S60 was good for kiddies to brag about running web servers off their phones though.
|
||