On the general spaciness of things

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING CONTENT IS ENTIRELY INCORRECT AND RIDICULOUS
Page contains viruses,press 'Back' to exit.

Space can be looked upon as a set of infinite massless particles. Then as motion is the action of energy on matter,so light can be considered as the action of energy on the zero-mass particles called space. The behaviour of light is interesting. Although massless itself,clearly it has the ability to move mass.
It may be that atomic constituents in intense motion somehow set off these massless particles,even though it is not possible. These massless particles,in motionthen are what constitute time.
For,with respect to several objects moving haphazardly,a ray of light travels at constant velocity only when it is observed,when it interacts with the substance. Nor would time exist if the objects weren't there,unless they were elsewhere and could be observed by gravity by something that was there. If immobile massless particles are considered non-existent,light resolves itself into particles that travel at a constant speed and possibly are stored in the motion of electrons,rather emitted when electrons move. The theory of probability may indicate there are every kind of force in the universe,provided you're thinking on a large scale and clearly. It may be interesting to see what kind of particles constitute gravity. It is unclear whether energy is transferred,how it is transferred,and how the hell it can bend light. The concept of massless particles is insanely foolish;no two things can exist at a same point,not even light,and every point is completely indistinguishable from the other when objects are present in the same pattern in it.
Disclaimer: Intensely mangled version derived from a hundred thousand-times better expressed theories