![]() ![]() | Page #: 18/21 |
![]() |
@miaiad | 4 June 25 |
Abu Barzah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, Man's feet will not move on the Day of Resurrection before he is asked about his life, how did he consume it, his knowledge, what did he do with it, his wealth, how did he earn it and how did he dispose of it, and about his body, how did he wear it out.'' [At-Tirmidhi]. ![]() Commentary: 1. This Hadith first of all highlights the importance and value of this transitory life, every breath of which is invaluable. Not a moment of it should, therefore, be wasted in the disobedience of Allah because one shall also be made to account for it. 2. Man shall also be answerable for his knowledge. Here, we find an inducement for acquiring religious knowledge because that alone is beneficial for him. He should make use of his knowledge for winning the pleasure of Allah. If he does not do that then he must think about the justification for not doing so. He must also think how he would be facing Allah on the Day of Resurrection. 3. The question in respect of wealth raised in this Hadith clearly shows that one should earn wealth by legitimate means only and spend it strictly in a lawful manner. If he takes to unfair means of income or squanders it, he will be sinful and required to account for the violation of the Divine injunctions. 4. One should protect his body from everything that is unlawful and force himself to submit to the Divine injunctions. When he is asked to account for neglecting them, it will be difficult for him to escape the consequences of accountability. In short, this Hadith makes one conscious of the accountability so that one keeps it all the time in view so that he will be saved from humiliation on the Day of Resurrection. How nice would it really be if one bears the accountability of the Day of Resurrection always in mind! |
||
![]() |
@kamela | 4 June 25 |
Thank's miaiad, now i am re_sharing it on other sites,
|
||
![]() |
@crail | 4 June 25 |
@ miaiad - 4.06.25 - 12:57am Okay, the basic logic tells (1) Any human-created religion is not a religion. It could be laws and rules. Laws and rules are always changing, can fit a group but not all people worldwide, and most of time they prone to errors, and desires of who made them. (2) A religion with a core that makes any creature as a God is not a true religion. Simply, A crature cannot be a Creator. Thinking of the above, you'll end up of very few religions currently existing (less than the count of fingers in one hand). ![]() They are all human created |
||
![]() |
@ogdenz | 5 June 25 |
*
@ miaiad - 2.06.25 - 04:26am (4) Let's all advocate a respectful environment and positive attitude in discussions. ![]() There's nothing positive about a so called prophet marrying a 6 year old. Muslims often try to justify this union by saying 'Well he didn't consumate that union until Aiesha was 9. It's vile and as a fellow human you must know that right? |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 5 June 25 |
@ crail - 4.06.25 - 07:42pm They are all human created From here, compasses point to different stars.... and that's a point where paths separate |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 5 June 25 |
@ ogdenz - 5.06.25 - 02:48am There's nothing positive about a so called prophet marrying a 6 year old. Muslims often try to justify this union by saying 'Well he didn't consumate that union until Aiesha was 9. It's vile and as a fellow human you must know that right? As a fello human, I can tell you (1) If there was an issue with this, or she (Ayesha) was caused to harm, then she would have complained. Both forced marriage and causing harm (physical / emotional) are against Islamic teachings. Instead, we see that Ayesha always loved and praised the Prophet in many many Hadiths. (2) Not to look at it from a personal perspective, but from entire society. Do you think the society that time will keep silent if there was something wrong? Or, so you think the nowadays people have found something that Ayesha's society was not aware about. We know in Islam (any maybe everywhere) there's no set age for marriage, but people and society may have some standards that becomes like habits or whatever called lowest level of acceptance. In a word, is that was wrong, the entire society would stand against it. (3) I would agree it is not suitable nowadays to get married at early age. Sometimes I ponder how my grandfather got married at age 15 (yeah 15 only). From history, we know that even youth at age 17 or 18 in few situations were even army leaders. I agree that nowadays 20s or 30s may not be like those. Simply, Age does not always tell you how much the person character is or how much he can do. ![]() |
||
![]() |
@kamela | 5 June 25 |
'Dear Miaiad brother, Eid Mubarak! How are you, Miaiad brother? My prayer is that Allah Ta'ala grants you a long life. You are the great preacher of ISLAM ......EID MUBARAK..... |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 7 June 25 |
@ kamela - 5.06.25 - 05:09pm 'Dear Miaiad brother, Eid Mubarak! How are you, Miaiad brother? My prayer is that Allah Ta'ala grants you a long life. You are the great preacher of ISLAM ......EID MUBARAK..... Eid Mubarak dear bro... May almighty Allah accept from you, make it full with Baraka for you and family. Jzk Allah |
||
![]() |
@trunking | 9 June 25 |
What do you think of fossilized human ancestors, pw?
|
||
![]() |
@trunking | 9 June 25 |
And dinosaurs?
|
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 11 June 25 |
@ trunking - 9.06.25 - 07:25am And dinosaurs? What is the issue with them? I know nothing more than what sicence says. Nothing is mentioned specifically about Dinos in Quran/Hadith. Well, why they should? We know nowadays that many creatures are endangered. We also know many species became extinct in recent history (say the past 100-500 years). Why Dino were all dead? I have no clue. Do you know? |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 11 June 25 |
@ trunking - 9.06.25 - 07:24am What do you think of fossilized human ancestors, pw? Nothing wrong with them.... those could be different species that looked similar to human body, but not like nowadays humans. What we know is that humanbeing (as we see ourselves now) has started sometime with Adam and Eve. There is no certain dating when this actually happened. Some scholars estimated 10k years, some others estimate 60k years ago.. Nothing certain. |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 11 June 25 |
Amr bin Shuaib (May Allah be pleased with him) on the authority of his father who heard it from his father reported: Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said: He is not one of us who shows no mercy to younger ones and does not acknowledge the honour due to our elders. [At-Tirmidhi and Abu Dawud]. Commentary: The words he is not one of us'' here mean that he is not following the way of the Prophet (PBUH). To show compassion to youngster means showing kindness and generosity to them. On the same principle, it is essential for the young that they respect the elders, the learned and the pious. |
||
![]() |
@crail | 11 June 25 |
@ miaiad - 11.06.25 - 03:15am Nothing wrong with them.... those could be different species that looked similar to human body, but not like nowadays humans. What we know is that humanbeing (as we see ourselves now) has started sometime with Adam and Eve. There is no certain dating when this actually happened. Some scholars estimated 10k years, some others estimate 60k years ago.. Nothing certain. Wrong, humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Proven fact |
||
![]() |
@crail | 11 June 25 |
Approximately 300,000 years
|
||
![]() |
@crail | 11 June 25 |
The apes we came from we are talking millions of years
|
||
![]() |
@crail | 11 June 25 |
@ miaiad - 11.06.25 - 03:12am What is the issue with them? I know nothing more than what sicence says. Nothing is mentioned specifically about Dinos in Quran/Hadith. Well, why they should? We know nowadays that many creatures are endangered. We also know many species became extinct in recent history (say the past 100-500 years). Why Dino were all dead? I have no clue. Do you know? It was an asteroid strike, and there is proof in rock samples |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 12 June 25 |
@ crail - 11.06.25 - 12:51pm It was an asteroid strike, and there is proof in rock samples dear, that's one hypothesis. with proofs and evidences? yip, so that progress it to be a strong hypothesis Other scholars may have other hypothesis, opinions, evidence, etc. - - - Not easy to claim certainity on things of that too old history. Whatever the reason was, no problem at all. - - - ![]() |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 12 June 25 |
@ crail - 11.06.25 - 12:33pm Approximately 300,000 years No problem. Yea, it could be. I mentioned few examples of estimates but none is easy to claim as a proven fact. The 300k years is another estiamte, and I think that's not bad estimate. A hypothesis, with all evidences, can progress to be a strong hypothesis... Then, with other studies, from different aspect,,, it could progress to be a theory (not a fact yet). Then, over time, if a theory stands up, and none was able to prove something against it, it becomes a fact. |
||
![]() |
@miaiad | 12 June 25 |
Abu Hurairah (May Allah bepleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, On the Resurrection Day, the rights will be paid to those to whom they are due so much so that a hornless sheep will be retaliated for by punishing the horned sheep which broke its horns. [Muslim]. ![]() Commentary: This Hadith makes it abundantly clear that there will be utmost justice on the Day of Resurrection. So much so that Allah will redress even the grievance of the aggressed animals against the aggressors. Thus, this Hadith serves a severe warning for people. When animals, who are devoid of sense, will not be forgiven, how would mankind be, which is gifted with senses? The latter will not be pardoned if they are guilty of having been unjust to anyone without adequately compensating them. |
||
![]() ![]() |