When in doubt, blame Labour, just like that slimey pr*ck Sunak did when he tried bringing up Corbyn to avoid answering uncomfortable questions about Zahawi's tax affairs at PMQs.

Let me make it clear to you obi seeing youre to thick to get it you vote Tory you get the globalist agenda you vote labour you get the globalist agenda on steroids.

So, in your esteemed opinion, who should people vote for in order to get globalist lite?

You dont want any globalists never mind lite.
You cant vote for anyone in this country
America still have a chance with America first policies

So, someone else who argues the wrongs of the current political situ to the hilt, only then to suggest non-voting. Excellent.

Voting got the country into this situ.
People still not realizing that politics is all a sham. The illusion of choice. Pick a group of bast*rds to rule over you for the next 4 or 5 years. If any party had truly wanted to end homelessness,food,fuel poverty or any other of the myriad social problems that blight society today then they would have more or less done it by now. Instead these problems are getting worse..and it's all by design.

I get that, but we need a system and that system needs management. Look at the people who haven't voted for the last couple of hundred years - how's that working out?

Hey, if there's a viable alternative, I'm all ears. But if the governments were brought down and it was left to anarchy, you wouldn't survive the first year.

Its an illusion of democracy though they all have the same goal

Its coming

I've had keyed access via my credit card for the last 30yrs.
They haven't starved me to death for calling a TV a man yet.

It bewilders me that you could misgender a TV when it's so obviously a woman because it never shuts up and always changes on a whim!

I'm no fan of things such as this but how exactly would this be any different from using your fingerprint or facial recognition to unlock your mobile phone?

This is just like the paranoia you seem to have about implanted microchips, in that it makes no sense. There is no need to implant people with chips as we all carry our mobile phones, smart watches and who knows what else around with us anyway. This time you're paranoid over a slightly different application for biometric identification technology that isn't much different from what had been in use for years already.

has been in use

Back in the day, no evil Bond villain worth his salt would be seen dead without an eyeball scanner security lock on the door of their secret lab!

I'm surprised the military don't already implant soldiers with 'dog chips', exactly like the one Fido at home might have, instead of giving them the traditional dog tags.

Because flesh can get removed in combat, not to mention microchips hate degaussing fields.

Its already started remember raging commie Trudeau freezing bank accounts of the Canadian truckers for protesting

Time for this corrupt Government to go
. .