![]() |
@badapple | |
Imagine if you will a world where the victorians had computers. I have just watched a program about victorian engineering. They showed a flour mill built in 1860, which still has all the original mechanics. in the 160 years its been working every day and has never broken down once, and not one part has needed replacing. They were showing clifton suspension bridge and the sewers in various places and a viaduct built somewhere in yorkshire. It got me thinking, the victorians did all these magnificent engeneering feats without computers or any of our modern technology. What if they had our technology ? how much more could they have achieved ? ![]() |
||
19
Replies
817
Views
0 Favourites
|
![]() |
@obi_jon | 14 July 20 |
Don't really need to imagine it, the 'steampunk' scene hipster folk have already done that.
|
||
![]() |
@sisfreak2017 | 14 July 20 |
A few planets would have been visited by humans.
|
||
![]() |
@piggle | 14 July 20 |
Here's the real kicker, imagine where we'd be if half the population wasn't subjugated. The Victorians would be martians
|
||
![]() |
@9362 | 14 July 20 |
Wasn't the first computer invented by the Victorians? Charles Babbage, Ada lovelace?
|
||
![]() |
@mikeymk | 15 July 20 |
They weren't bound by the legislations of today. Or the politics.
|
||
![]() |
@3mel | 15 July 20 |
they built things with the vision that their efforts should last. MBGA ![]() |
||
![]() |
@vampboy | 15 July 20 |
@ badapple - 14.07.20 - 03:15pm Imagine if you will a world where the victorians had computers. I have just watched a program about victorian engineering. They showed a flour mill built in 1860, which still has all the original mechanics. in the 160 years its been working every day and has never broken down once, and not one part has needed replacing. They were showing clifton suspension bridge and the sewers in various places and a viaduct built somewhere in yorkshire. It got me thinking, the victorians did all these magnificent engeneering feats without computers or any of our modern technology. What if they had our technology ? how much more could they have achieved ? ![]() They'd have freaked out and felt fear over the technology. There were already widespread complaints during that period about how digital print would completely turn us blind, imagine all the other liberalism that comes with technology? Society was too conservative then, and it was too superstitious. Technology would have been shunned or blocked. I don't think they were ready for such large scale technological production eitherway. |
||
![]() |
@3mel | 15 July 20 |
I doubt there were any complaints during the Victorian era about the dangers of digital print
|
||
![]() |
@vampboy | 15 July 20 |
|
||
![]() |
@thetagruntbird | 15 July 20 |
@ vampboy - 15.07.20 - 02:49am They'd have freaked out and felt fear over the technology. There were already widespread complaints during that period about how digital print would completely turn us blind, imagine all the other liberalism that comes with technology? Society was too conservative then, and it was too superstitious. Technology would have been shunned or blocked. I don't think they were ready for such large scale technological production eitherway. There were already widespread complaints during that period about how digital print would completely turn us blind?? Where did you get that from? Did you make it up or is that what they are teaching in schools now? Thats like saying cave men were up in arms about factory farming ![]() |
||
![]() |
@vampboy | 15 July 20 |
@ thetagruntbird - 15.07.20 - 03:59am There were already widespread complaints during that period about how digital print would completely turn us blind?? Where did you get that from? Did you make it up or is that what they are teaching in schools now? Thats like saying cave men were up in arms about factory farming ![]() They weren't as backward as we'd like to think they are; ''In the 1800s, the rise of mass print was both blamed for an increase in eye problems and was responsible for dramatising the fallibility of vision too. As the amount of known eye problems increased, the Victorians predicted that without appropriate care and attention Britains population would become blind. In 1884, an article in The Morning Post newspaper proposed that: The culture of the eyes and efforts to improve the faculty of seeing must become matters of attentive consideration and practice, unless the deterioration is to continue and future generations are to grope about the world being pure blind. In 1889 the Illustrated London News questioned: To what are we coming? Now we are informed by men of science that the eyes used so effectively by our forefathers will not suffice for us, and that there is a prospect of England becoming pure blind. The article continued, considering potential causes for this acceleration, and concluded that it could be partly explained by evolution and inheritance.'' |
||
![]() |
@thetagruntbird | 15 July 20 |
Ok im sorry for mocking, it was the idea of victorians being worried about anything digital - but yes, our eyesight is harmed by looking at a screen for hours
|
||
![]() |
@3mel | 15 July 20 |
Victorian printing presses weren't digital |
||
![]() |
@vampboy | 15 July 20 |
@ thetagruntbird - 15.07.20 - 04:15am Ok im sorry for mocking, it was the idea of victorians being worried about anything digital - but yes, our eyesight is harmed by looking at a screen for hours They'd predict an age of digital printing though and they concluded we'd all turn blind. Seems like they were halfway right. ![]() |
||
![]() |
@thetagruntbird | 15 July 20 |
I dont agree that they predicted digital printing exactly but in the language of the time, they may have been right about us all being blind.....my eyesight plummeted reading a small print steven king by candlelight
|
||
![]() |
@iilmadme | 15 July 20 |
It would be the ankle p0rn that made them blind
|
||
![]() |
@3mel | 15 July 20 |
@ iilmadme - 15.07.20 - 08:44am It would be the ankle p0rn that made them blind one of things you've heard somewhere but aren't sure when etc. I've heard that furniture used to have it's legs covered so as to not inflame the passions of anyone seeing it. |
||
![]() |
@iilmadme | 15 July 20 |
@ 3mel - 15.07.20 - 09:52am one of things you've heard somewhere but aren't sure when etc. I've heard that furniture used to have it's legs covered so as to not inflame the passions of anyone seeing it. ![]() |
||
![]() |
@badapple | 15 July 20 |
my mate used to be into that victorian p0rn , his toilet walls had literally hundreds of photos and post cards. Some of them were just soft stuff, like women poseing in their corsets and stuff, one or 2 showing either a boob or the lady garden. He had a large collection of saucy seaside postcards too.
|
||