![]() |
@recurve16 | |
35
Replies
1920
Views
0 Favourites
|
Page #: 1/4 |
![]() |
@recurve16 | 15 September 20 |
![]() |
@gt_tdi | 15 September 20 |
1, definitely. 2's a bit jarring because of the composition.
|
||
![]() |
@9362 | 15 September 20 |
Number 1
|
||
![]() |
@crail | 15 September 20 |
1
|
||
![]() |
@corpse81 | 15 September 20 |
2.
|
||
![]() |
@3mel | 15 September 20 |
OK everyone can hate me for pointing this out but is the perspective on the wings in picture 1 just plain wrong ? (no pun intended) relative to the fuselage one wing is way too big to me. |
||
![]() |
@bambi60 | 15 September 20 |
@ 3mel - 15.09.20 - 12:38am OK everyone can hate me for pointing this out but is the perspective on the wings in picture 1 just plain wrong ? (no pun intended) relative to the fuselage one wing is way too big to me. Your correct imo ![]() It's a poor representation ....even Beano readers would be critical..... |
||
![]() |
@1clivey1 | 15 September 20 |
No1 deffo
|
||
![]() |
@recurve16 | 15 September 20 |
@ 3mel - 15.09.20 - 12:38am OK everyone can hate me for pointing this out but is the perspective on the wings in picture 1 just plain wrong ? (no pun intended) relative to the fuselage one wing is way too big to me. Mel ya fkr, I didn't see that. ![]() If you look at the lead plane in pic 2 it seems to have the same thing going on. |
||
![]() |
@alanball | 15 September 20 |
Both s**te
|
||