As a matter of a fact moderate Remainers condemned the hecklers and the Luxumbourg PM for not hosting the conference indoors. Also they admitted it made The EU look bad.

Yes, approval during the war didn't translate into winning an election on domestic issues. He had around an 80pc approval rating during the war.

I never said they don't want a war, I said what's going on doesn't have anything to do with the oil price because there are far simpler ways to increase it.

Why the fk are you playing the race card when that should have absolutely nothing to do with it?Clearly you despise him but it seems that you would rather someone other then Churchill had been in charge. Someone who would have accepted appeasement with hitler. Lord Halifax perhaps?

Yup especially when many of em were so concerned about brexit they couldn't be bothered to vote in the referendum. The real name for em is cowards and traitors, they are so scared brexit will be a success they are actively working to prevent that success.

Saf lil fks that they are.

They have been destroying Yemen for ages it is nothing new

Quite right too. He was a man for those times

Time for Israel to step up

how is it clear to you that ogdenz would rather have someone who would have appeased Hitler ?
could equally why are you so invested in protecting Churchill's reputation ? the man's shortcomings are well documented.

The race card is being fairly played here as he was a massive racist. Why do you assume I would want someone else or even worse than Winston or an appeaser? What the hell is wrong with you?
You aren't one of those idiots that think if someone doesn't like Winston then he must automatically like someone worse are you?
E.g. I hate the Conservatives so I must automatically be a Labour supporter?
Come on digits you have a better mind than that.

I also would of had you down for an appeaser

There's no way you would of supported war in 1939 ....not a chance

My comments re Churchill arent even related to world war 2..well not up until the previous comment.

Then you would be wrong.

Personally I think history has been very unfair to Neville. Don't think I would of supported war in 1939. Not that soon after ww1 and all that entailed. Obviously with the benefit of hindsite that would of been wrong ...

I don't think I would have supported war when Poland was invaded. Maybe when France was invaded.

that's a weird statement.

had any of us been born so as to be adults around that time the culture of the day would've made us into people of the day.

Maybe, I would of still said that preserving the empire should of been of primary importance. Hitler did offer Churchill such a deal after the fall of France

I think I would have been more concerned with the empire myself rather than defending Europe.

Gammons are the cowards and traitors. We fought two world wars to bring peace and unity to Europe and you traitors want to throw it all away. The soldiers who gave their lives would be rolling in their graves at you cowards.