Creepy c*nts mom's paid her off.

Utter scum

Coming from the guy who constantly refuses to condemn Muslim paedophiles there is a whole lot of hypocrisy there from you

All satanic nonces

I condemn paedos as a whole you sick c**t

Still trying to derail the thread the horrible c**t

Trying to brush it under the carpet for their party in June. Time for this lot to go

The grand old Duke of York,he had 12 million quid.
He gave it to someone he never met,for something he never did.

Why do you distinguish between Muslim paedos and other paedos? Do The Muslim ones sicken you more than others?

It's weird as fk. You only have to see his many attempts in this thread trying to derail it and talk about Muslims. he even played down the accusations against Andrew

Yep.

Paid someone he's never met 4 times more than he paid off the mother of his children in their divorce settlement. Fergie be raging

Prince Andrew could be in line for 7 million pounds of taxpayer funded compensation
money if he is forced out of his grace and favour home in Windsor.

3 million pounds and not skullverized into a bridge. Sweet deal. Let others eat cake.

Cake is only available to those who can afford to pay their heating bills.

Jean-Claude Brunel, the French modelling agent that was also implicated by Virginia Guiffre and several others victims in the Epstein network, has been found dead, hanging in the Paris prison cell where he was awaiting trial on multiple rape charges.

Now, I think it's fair to say that I tend to be pretty skeptical about conspiracy theories but that's just a tad too suspicious even for me, not to mention how highly convenient it obviously is for some people.

obis waking up

Except it's not the Queen herself who is stopping the redacted sections of Mountbatten's diaries from being made public it's the UK government's Cabinet Office, whose officially stated reason for doing so is ''that the information is too sensitive to be released and that the dignity of the Queen could be compromised.

The redacted sections are thought to relate mostly to Mountbatten's time as the final Viceroy before India's independence from British rule and his correspondence with the Queen over the partitioning of India and Pakistan, which potentially contain information so controversial/inflammatory that it could be damaging to the UK's present day relationships with the 2 countries.

There has been speculation about details that might reveal Mountbatten was gay/bisexual, or had some unusual sexual pecadillos, and also, that his wife may have been having an affair with the then Indian prime minister, Nehru, but there have never been any indications or suspicion of 'child abuse/paedophilia', as the above is insinuating.

I'm not defending them, just factual accuracy.

How could he have proved his innocence though. How could anyone actually if someone from 20 years ago or whenever said that. It would be your word against theirs. In the climate of believe all women How would you fancy your chances and wouldn't you just pay someone to fu*k off and leave you alone if you had that option available to you?