![]() ![]() | Page #: 3/136 |
![]() |
@capt.h | 17 November 07 |
and what book isn't man-made,pray tell?
|
||
![]() |
@mumin | 17 November 07 |
Will come back soon after prayer Inshaa Allah. There are too much things. You say Quran says evil and corrupt or terrorism etc. etc. Go and seach is there these types of words or insulting of Prophets, womens or these types of teachings? O brothers and sisters in Christianty! follow to correct Guidance.
|
||
![]() |
@capt.h | 17 November 07 |
the bible is man-made.it's mass produced just like any other book.(prophecies btw) i don't beleive that it was written before the 'prophecies' came to pass
|
||
![]() |
@capt.h | 17 November 07 |
i don't even know why i'm in here lol i'm an atheist! the bible is s**t ![]() |
||
![]() |
@c4r3fr33 | 17 November 07 |
![]() |
||
![]() |
@c4r3fr33 | 17 November 07 |
Maybe the world leaders made daniels prophesies come true? ![]() |
||
![]() |
@mumin | 17 November 07 |
I'm not saying from myself because I'm not enemy of God, I believe in God and in their Prophets too. If you want to read the online bible bookmark the page http://mobible.org/wml/ You have mind, sense, intelligence, read and do research at the Book of Guidance, Al-Quran. The original and final words of Lord of the Mankind, Jinns, and that all exists.
|
||
![]() |
@gbopp | 17 November 07 |
Matthew10:34-39. Christ does not attack family relationships, but indicates that no earthly tie, however intimate, should detract from aggressive loyalty to Him. This loyalty may even result in certain family members being shunned by others. (verses 35, 35).
|
||
![]() |
@mumin | 17 November 07 |
And what about Mathew 10 : 34, 35, and Mathew 12 : 49?
|
||
![]() |
@gbopp | 17 November 07 |
Luke12:49, 50. some commentators feel the fire symbolizes the divisive nature of Christ's ministry, consuming the destructible and purifying the indestructible. However, in light of His wish that the fire ''were already kindled'' And the obvious reference to His death as a prerequisite to the fire's appearing, it is better to understand the statement to be a reference to the burning zeal of
|
||
![]() ![]() |