Page #: 5/5 |
@saif7 | 16 February 11 | |
And now when they entered they got everything ready and served by symbian ,they just observed why symbian sales are so high,cause of variety in aaps and they come up with their aap markets with fancy ui and everything that can be pun in to look it was their own creation
|
||
@sohil876 | 16 February 11 | |
@above, do you even know what you are saying? Symbian, Android and iOS are completely diffrent platform, Symbian did not benifited any other thing except itself from the past 10 years. And you say Nokia dropped Symbian because it was not suitable for touch phones, which is just cr*p, because Symbian4 was planned to introduce a new GUI library framework specifically designed for a touch-based interface, known as UI Extensions for Mobile or UIEMO (internal project name Orbit), which was built on t
|
||
@sohil876 | 16 February 11 | |
built on top of Qt. So if touch interface was the problem then Nokia would have released Symbian4 instead of dropping it. Its totally clear that Nokia dropped symbian because it was not enough to compete with Android, iOS or WebOS so they migrated to WP.
|
||
@sohil876 | 16 February 11 | |
However, in October 2010 Nokia announced that the Orbit/UIEMO has been cancelled, so there is no hope to get this Library Framework via Update in S3 devices. In short Symbian was top OS before but now better OS have arrived in market, Nokia too knew it, therefore they dropped it and migrated to something else.
|
||
@sohil876 | 17 February 11 | |
Java : 2690(s40v6) Symbian : I currently have C5 (s60v3) and 5800xm(s60v5). I also have used N73ME, N86. Android : SE X10 Mini(v2.1 Eclair)
|
||
@n3cipher | 17 February 11 | |
For me personal, I have not use an andriod phone but I have seen screenshots. However I would try it only if it is on a nokia.
|
||
@n3cipher | 17 February 11 | |
I think I might buy the n900 and again wait to see what nokia is up to
|
||