You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please
|
@prince15 | |
|
i cant really make my mind up... wat are the draw back of these design... which i better... or are they all equivalent potential. plz |
||
|
9
Replies
2838
Views
0 Favourites
|
||
|
@labello | 1 January 12 |
|
Inline is mre well balanced.
|
||
|
@spartan2 | 1 January 12 |
|
Flat 6 is technically the best design for an 'engine', But not necessarily to fit into a car. Lots of other factors.
|
||
|
|
@prince15 | 1 January 12 |
|
explain wat you mean its more balance... am thinkin of gettin a straight 6 but am wondering if it will fit though.
|
||
|
@freakman | 5 January 12 |
|
Any engine can be balanced by component balancing..thats how they make spoon engines.
|
||
|
@freekick | 15 January 12 |
|
vr6 and v6 is the same thing 
|
||
|
|
@spartan2 | 15 January 12 |
|
VR6 is a tightly angled vee engine with the cylinders very close together. Instead of a conventional 45 degrees plus bank separation they typically have less than 20 degrees
|
||
|
@turbozx | 16 January 12 |
|
V6 is the best.i rather v6 its more compacts.straight six is too long
|
||
|
@blueoval | 19 January 12 |
|
D flat6 configuration is d best performance design as it uses a crossplane crankdesign. D straight6 wil b best fo durability (if it boasts a longer stroke than bore) as its big on low rev torque. D v6 is basicaly just a compact design of a 6cyl and allow d crank to accomodate two bigend journals between mainbrgs. So u loose atleast 3 mainbrgs from straigt to v6 and that spares weight nd cost. So in short, no configuration is the best, its a matter of practicality nd cost.
|
||
|
@grunter | 25 January 12 |
|
vr6 only has one head apossed to a v6 having 2 heads now whos stupid........  for me be straight or v
|
||
