Page #: 17/18 |
@jlh1182 | 16 November 15 | |
@ greenaura - 16.11.15 - 01:30pm its not (or shouldnt be) the medias responsibility to pick which side of the story we hear and what we dont. they should simply report to us the information. for example, they didnt show isis' video, but they showed a video from the anonymous hacker group threatening isis. the media are not neutral point.. |
||
@mikeymk | 16 November 15 | |
@ jlh1182 - 16.11.15 - 01:47pm right wing nationalists i think m8, muslim/arab version.. Think of like breviks christians or b.np, doesnt matter what ur flag is, ur patron, the traits are all the same, id say as dangerous as b.np type so judge for urself.. The site, yeah. The meeting still happened. Unfortunate timing and of course, that heavily biased article is not in any way gonna be an accurate representation of what the meeting was about, how it turned out. |
||
@mok214 | 16 November 15 | |
@ wakeup4 - 16.11.15 - 01:36pm Remember you have more chance of being killed by a bee sting Do hornets count? If so, I have survived that bullet. BTW. I have been shot once, I hope I never get shot again. |
||
@wakeup4 | 16 November 15 | |
The media are proper dirtbags they are fed the narrative and just spew it out. The proper investigative journalist is a dying breed.
|
||
@delwooker | 16 November 15 | |
*
A good journalsit is someone who is good at gossip. You tell a story and then built on it. You allways tell the truth. The facts are all in your article. It's in the way you tell the story and how well you know your target audience. You should be able to gossip. That's the long and short of it. We all know the street gossip. She tells a story to get a reaction. When she gets the reaction she takes it further. The gossip builds and builds until you as a normal inteligent person don't know the truth anymore.
|
||
@mok214 | 16 November 15 | |
@ wakeup4 - 16.11.15 - 04:41pm The media are proper dirtbags they are fed the narrative and just spew it out. The proper investigative journalist is a dying breed. True, the media cares more about twitter than research. |
||
@jlh1182 | 16 November 15 | |
@ mikeymk - 16.11.15 - 04:13pm The site, yeah. The meeting still happened. Unfortunate timing and of course, that heavily biased article is not in any way gonna be an accurate representation of what the meeting was about, how it turned out. true it was very biased, i took the notion that u had already authenticated the group in some way and trusted u were not presented propoganda, eg if this was a legit muslim meeting about the muslim community rather than an actual isis rally, u would or should have given a bit more care as its just across the way from u.. Based on the reporting, and that if it is all accurate, my coments on them are the same.. |
||
@jlh1182 | 16 November 15 | |
interestingly, can i ask if u would attend such a rally to determin what its about? I would only do it if people on the outside didnt hold me in contempt or suspicion, oddly id have to make it public what i was doing and then somehow sit amongst those people in an unbiased situation..
|
||
@bozzalad | 16 November 15 | |
like that's gonna happen
|
||
@jlh1182 | 16 November 15 | |
because i dont sit on the fence..
|
||