@bozzalad | ||
British Sikh couple are told they cannot adopt a white child because of their 'cultural heritage' as officials advise them to go to India instead Sandeep and Reena Mander said they were advised to adopt a child from India The advice was given despite the fact they are a British couple from Berkshire The couple told an adoption agency they were very happy to adopt a child from any ethnic background The couple, both business professionals in their 30s, told an adoption agency they were very happy to adopt a child from any ethnic background. Despite being found to be suitable adoptive parents after a home visit, the couple claim the agency said they shouldnt apply because only white children were available. Adopt Berkshire, the county-wide agency run by the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, said white British or European parents would be given preference. They have now begun legal action to overturn the decision, claiming discrimination in the provision of services. The Manders have been trying to conceive for seven years, and have had 16 sessions of IVF treatment. Mr Mander, 35, said: Having attended introductory workshops organised by RBWM and Adopt Berkshire, giving an adopted child no matter what race the security of a loving home was all we wanted to do. What we didnt expect was a refusal for us to even apply for adoption, not because of our incapability to adopt, but because our cultural heritage was defined as Indian/Pakistani. It is legal for agencies to give preference to parents from the same ethnic group, but government guidelines stipulate different racial backgrounds should not prevent a couple from adopting. Falling adoption numbers have been blamed on the misguided belief that children should only be adopted by families of the same ethnic background. Personally i think the rule is pathetic as are those who enforce it on our Sikh community |
||
62
Replies
1867
Views
0 Favourites
|
Page #: 1/7 |
@3mel | 27 June 17 | |
stupid rule, but was it a rule or a poor staff members interpretation of one ?
|
||
@crail | 27 June 17 | |
Disgusting
|
||
@iilmadme | 27 June 17 | |
The process of weeding out bad candidates seems that stringent that whoever is deemed suitable probably is.i dont think we have the luxury of being this harsh anymore
|
||
@bozzalad | 27 June 17 | |
it is a rule mel, also it is legal n across the uk
|
||
@crlywrly | 27 June 17 | |
It is a stupid rule. They are fit to adopt so why should a child be deprived of a loving home?
|
||
@bozzalad | 27 June 17 | |
@ iilmadme - 27.06.17 - 04:19pm The process of weeding out bad candidates seems that stringent that whoever is deemed suitable probably is.i dont think we have the luxury of being this harsh anymore seems it is widespread we already know politics plays a part |
||
@iilmadme | 27 June 17 | |
Not even allowed to register..the usa has approved them
|
||
@bozzalad | 27 June 17 | |
In 2015, senior judges ruled on a test case that allowed two black African boys to be adopted by a white British couple. In spite of the cultural differences, the Court of Appeal said the couple were perfectly suited to adopt the brothers one of whom has Downs syndrome. Social workers believed that white parents couldnt met the childrens needs, including preparing them for the impact of racism. |
||
@ladibud | 27 June 17 | |
a very backward stance for a country like the UK... very stupid if you bear in mind that multi cultural marriages and relationships bring forth mixed race kids, where a white parent may be bringing up their own indian / black whatever child.
|
||
@10125141 | 27 June 17 | |
Well if they were famous like Madonna, there would be no problem.
|
||