Page #: 14/18 |
@mikeymk | 21 February 20 | |
Credible in what way? Being loose with sensitive information to keep the irrelevant Joe Public informed?
|
||
@cleancut | 21 February 20 | |
Credible in their investigations and analysis on matters of national security. Maybe Jimmy Dore has a secret team of thousands of career agents working for the benefit of the USA. I mean I doubt it, but I don't know for certain. Like kimjong seems to be that Russia is totally innocent.
|
||
@dan27notts | 21 February 20 | |
@ cleancut - 21.02.20 - 09:42pm Credible in their investigations and analysis on matters of national security. Maybe Jimmy Dore has a secret team of thousands of career agents working for the benefit of the USA. I mean I doubt it, but I don't know for certain. Like kimjong seems to be that Russia is totally innocent. The information the CIA would realise is not credible. They're not stupid enough to post the truth. |
||
@wakeup4 | 21 February 20 | |
@ kimjongl - 21.02.20 - 11:46am Debunking this latest nonsense and Russiagate in general. http://youtu.be/Y8nMOWqIijg What happened to dore did he wake up? |
||
@3mel | 21 February 20 | |
@ cleancut - 21.02.20 - 09:42pm Credible in their investigations and analysis on matters of national security. Maybe Jimmy Dore has a secret team of thousands of career agents working for the benefit of the USA. I mean I doubt it, but I don't know for certain. Like kimjong seems to be that Russia is totally innocent. some official said part of their evidence was use of characters from the Russian alphabet left behind. that's beyond sloppy for state actors. doesn't make Russia innocent, they can be guilty and being setup as guilty too. |
||
@3mel | 22 February 20 | |
turns out Dana Rorhabacher confirms he did make this offer to Assange, with the alteration that it was his own idea and the WH never knew. he apparently mentions that he phoned the un-involved WH immediately upon finishing his talk with Assange and spoke to John Kelly. |
||
@sisfreak2017 | 22 February 20 | |
Let him go.
|
||
@kimjongl | 22 February 20 | |
@ cleancut - 21.02.20 - 09:42pm Credible in their investigations and analysis on matters of national security. Maybe Jimmy Dore has a secret team of thousands of career agents working for the benefit of the USA. I mean I doubt it, but I don't know for certain. Like kimjong seems to be that Russia is totally innocent. How can there investigation be credible when they relied on information from a third party that was being paid by the supposed victim of the crime without independently verifying it themselves? |
||
@kimjongl | 22 February 20 | |
*
@ wakeup4 - 21.02.20 - 10:39pm What happened to dore did he wake up? He realized leftists buying into the Russian hoax were useful idiots of the DNC establishment. I don't agree with him ideologically but at least he wants to oppose based on policy not nonsense about Russian hacking. |
||
@cleancut | 22 February 20 | |
@ kimjongl - 22.02.20 - 07:12am He realized leftists buying into the Russian hoax were useful idiots of the DNC establishment. I don't agree with him ideologically but at least he wants to oppose based on policy not nonsense about Russian hacking. This is where it's so warped, why would left leaning liberals be hostile to The Russian Federation? Traditionally they are quite open, welcoming and pretty supportive of Russia and the post Soviet States-look at Sanders he's a prime example. Now it's the GOP who's balls deep in the Kremlin's fantasy land. It's all just money, kompromat and the realisation that we don't have very long lives so they may just as well take everything offered and enjoy the good life whilst they're still able to enjoy it. It's cynical and short sighted but who wouldn't do it in their position? The DNC being hacked by a group from Russia-st Petersburg I think- is a stone cold fact. You can't in good faith claim otherwise. |
||