Page #: 10/11 |
@3mel | 17 October 19 | |
@ kimjongl - 17.10.19 - 08:37pm No it tells you Catholic priests are over represented, if it were extended to all Catholic men i suspect the rate of representation would drastically reduce. The fact that 84pc of grooming gangs are in one particular community also explains their enthusiastic participation in other forms of child r*pe and abuse. and if your 84 percent figure for grooming gangs was extended to all muslim men the rate of representation would do what ? |
||
@kimjongl | 17 October 19 | |
84pc of grooming gangs. 95pc of ordained men. The problem is your comparison, that's why you're not understanding why one is an overrepresentation of one community and one isn't. |
||
@3mel | 17 October 19 | |
it's an over representation amongst grooming gangs, amongst the muslin community, there'd be zeros after the decimal point in percentage terms.
|
||
@kimjongl | 17 October 19 | |
So muslims are overrepresented in a criminal activity while Catholic paedophile priests are overepresented in a profession.
|
||
@3mel | 17 October 19 | |
no, being in a grooming gang is not a separate category of crime from all other forms child sexual abuse. the charges they'd face put them in the same cesspit as all other practitioners child sexual abuse, catholic priests included. for all you know the representation of muslin men is no higher than in any other cultural or religious grouping. |
||
@kimjongl | 17 October 19 | |
No it isn't a separate category of crime. Child r*pe is child r*pe. The info we have about grooming gangs and who participates in this crime should be enough to work out the attitude of the community that harbours them, especially in other child r*pe and abuse cases.
|
||
@3mel | 17 October 19 | |
I'd always been under the impression these gangs were exclusively muslim, finding out they're not undermines the argument that it's linked to a culture exclusively. if you can prove these crimes were known about then you can talk about harbouring and attitudes. more likely that criminal activities are kept secret. |
||
@recurve16 | 17 October 19 | |
Nobody has ever claimed the groomers were exclusively Muslim. It has always been known non Muslims were involved, it was predominantly Muslims. There has been plenty proof that the crimes were known about, from the local community, to council workers, to cops. Who all covered it up for years, remember ? Come on Mel, we've been here before, don't you remember the Rotherham topics ? |
||
@3mel | 17 October 19 | |
disbelieved or attributed to racism last I heard on subject. that should NEVER ever be the case. |
||
@recurve16 | 17 October 19 | |
Basically covered up so as not to offend our backward, barbaric, brainwashed friends. But feel free to candy coat it with whatever flavour you prefer... |
||