Page #: 283/927 |
@vampboy | 11 June 20 | |
@ ufohunter - 11.06.20 - 08:36pm Biden said on one radio talk show that 'If you don't vote Democrat, you ain't black' That's only the tip of an iceberg. Subtle racism out on display for the world. Democrats have been using this card for decades to secure votes. |
||
@ufohunter | 11 June 20 | |
I don't really like that Charlamagne tha God guy by his saying that the Black Panthers must continue the fight and Africans must form a bloc for tackling racism and supporting Black Consciousness and Black Supremacism movements around the world It's like KKK |
||
@ufohunter | 11 June 20 | |
@ vampboy - 11.06.20 - 08:37pm Lack of black role models is exactly why society has manifested in the way it has today. You couldn't possibly compare the presence or the living influence from an individual like MLK with most role models young black men have today. I listen to Creflo A Dollar podcasts and stuff lol |
||
@prattle | 11 June 20 | |
@ vampboy - 11.06.20 - 08:30pm You've gone off on a tangent. Who said Blm owns black support? Well, I thought that's exactly where we started our discussion from. I think you have missed the focal point of our discussion earlier by a large margin. Biden's not the representative of the whole, but clearly a good indicator of what views most leftists hold dear, seeing his soaring popularity in polls, and seeing as there was zero condemnation from the left for his offensive remark against blacks. Show me examples where the left condemned such manner of speech. Only then will you have a point. After all isn't silence equal to violence also? In no way shape or form did I say or infer that blm owns black support, you brought it up, you said they didn't own black support, first time it was mentioned. A senile old man with serious ulterior motives is a good indicator of what most leftists hold dear? Ok. There was zero condemnation from the left, well that's a bold statement. The time and research you would need to arrive at that conclusion is massive, you would need not only to know who all the lefties are, but also that youre tapped in to everything they've said in every social media post throughout all social media mediums as well as other mediums? |
||
@vampboy | 11 June 20 | |
I always say religion is a great business to get into if you want money and can feign compassion.
|
||
@ufohunter | 11 June 20 | |
@ vampboy - 11.06.20 - 08:49pm I always say religion is a great business to get into if you want money and can feign compassion. Well, those Baptist preachers are pretty welcoming |
||
@vampboy | 11 June 20 | |
@ prattle - 11.06.20 - 08:48pm In no way shape or form did I say or infer that blm owns black support, you brought it up, you said they didn't own black support, first time it was mentioned. A senile old man with serious ulterior motives is a good indicator of what most leftists hold dear? Ok. There was zero condemnation from the left, well that's a bold statement. The time and research you would need to arrive at that conclusion is massive, you would need not only to know who all the lefties are, but also that youre tapped in to everything they've said in every social media post throughout all social media mediums as well as other mediums? That discussion was relevant to the point of what subtle racism is, and how it manfisted from the posts of another user. That's why I was on the tanget and you were slightly off the mark. The senile oldman might very well become president, thus representing not only an ideological framework from a group of people, but also a country as a whole. Say, we assume, you're right, and there was condemnation from some obsecure source, is it truly illogical to challenge its existence when no mainstream leftist newspaper even brought the discussion up as opposed to them reporting even on the most obsolete tweets trump posts? Is it unreasonable to negate its existence unless shown contrary evidence to prove that it exists? What do you think a reasonable person would assume from the silence while millions of blacks were/are assumed to be BLM while against Trump by many leftists? Generalizations hold no weight in most arguments, but they are quite good indicators of the ideals an ideology supposedly holds. |
||
@prattle | 11 June 20 | |
@ vampboy - 11.06.20 - 08:58pm That discussion was relevant to the point of what subtle racism is, and how it manfisted from the posts of another user. That's why I was on the tanget and you were slightly off the mark. The senile oldman might very well become president, thus representing not only an ideological framework from a group of people, but also a country as a whole. Say, we assume, you're right, and there was condemnation from some obsecure source, is it truly illogical to challenge its existence when no mainstream leftist newspaper even brought the discussion up as opposed to them reporting even on the most obsolete tweets trump posts? Is it unreasonable to negate its existence unless shown contrary evidence to prove that it exists? What do you think a reasonable person would assume from the silence while millions of blacks were/are assumed to be BLM while against Trump by many leftists? Generalizations hold no weight in most arguments, but they are quite good indicators of the ideals an ideology supposedly holds. Again you're auditing the opinions of a large group of people based on the worst standards, you're expecting the main left news outlets to condemn the words of a man that is most likely funded by the people who own the news outlets. Auditing is an accounting practice for sales, or purchases, and is frought with sampling risk, you cant audit the opinions of a large group of people regardless of their ideological leaning, because opinions are formed from life experience. Just because you're not aware of the condemnation does not equate to there being no condemnation. Let's not forget, you're obviously politically aligned, which essentially means you're objectivity is compromised. |
||
@trashy | 11 June 20 | |
@ phallica - 11.06.20 - 08:38pm Now we have, Shaun King, a white liberal speaking for blacks. He's half black. His biological dad is apparently light skinned. Not that it matters |
||
@bozzalad | 11 June 20 | |
@ vampboy - 11.06.20 - 03:45pm Colonization led to modern development and prosperity even in regions that were plagued by corruption and violence before and after colonialists. Many states were colonized, including Singapore, and they are prosperous and considerably stable. Japan was nuked and lost the world war. Germany was divided into two parts and suffered massive economic disruptions. South Korea suffered the chaos of various wars. Why is it only Africa has not been able to recover and the blame is always put on colonialism? hmmmmmm |
||