Page #: 39/40 |
@alvar89 | 30 August 15 | |
You ppl do understand the text was written thousands of years ago by a man that era what he got revealed to him by God and interpreted it into easy understandable language for the ppl that time. It holds a strong message in it and is no astro scientific research book. And the light part would be easy enough as in revelations it says God Himself will be there light.
|
||
@manszar | 30 August 15 | |
@ alvar89 - 30.08.15 - 05:26am You ppl do understand the text was written thousands of years ago by a man that era what he got revealed to him by God and interpreted it into easy understandable language for the ppl that time. It holds a strong message in it and is no astro scientific research book. And the light part would be easy enough as in revelations it says God Himself will be there light. More claims of a inadequate god. Genesis could of contained very simple truths that we could have pointed to today to show it could only of come from God. |
||
@alvar89 | 30 August 15 | |
@ manszar - 30.08.15 - 08:11am More claims of a inadequate god. Genesis could of contained very simple truths that we could have pointed to today to show it could only of come from God. So the universe did not have a Maker? |
||
@mikeymk | 31 August 15 | |
The bible was written by people who didn't even know theworld was round - all religions were written by people who really had little understanding of anything, like their people, but there was a genuine call for order so they were written. These days, thanks to science and technology, we have more of an understanding of what we are, or at least what's required. That's not to say there isn't still a demand for religion/cults. The subject of evolution shows this quite well - not so much the intrigue about what started the ball rolling (evolution could only start after something existed, else it couldn't evolve in the first place), no, the main motivation is the fear of where evolution is going. Millions just aren't prepared to believe that evolution is the answer to our future. That we've got to stay on this earth for millions of years until the inevitable happens and we die out. Well what's the point. Might as well r*pe and steal. No, the anti-evolutionists wanna believe in the second coming, visits, a cuddle of the ideal that we're not alone. Personally, I think it's pretty obvious that we're a part of something that was formed. I also believe we're not here for no reason. But I also believe that we are evolving and it's down to us to take this in the best direction we can for as long as we can, and that religions are proving to be detrimental to that. I believe this because I have my own mind, as i don't have to follow the rules of a book written by someone who didn't have any more of a clue. |
||
@manszar | 31 August 15 | |
@ alvar89 - 30.08.15 - 09:53am So the universe did not have a Maker? not as described in the bible. we know that much, unless god is a deceiver |
||
@obi_jon | 11 September 15 | |
A new species of early homonid, recently discovered in a South African cave, could significantly alter our thinking about the evolution of our human ancestors. Homo Naledi is believed to be around 2-3million years old and appears to show signs of sophisticated ritualistic behaviour at a much earlier stage than previously known. http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/newly-discovered-human-ancestor-likely-ritualistically-disposed-its-dead |
||
@nukeme | 12 September 15 | |
@ mikeymk - 31.08.15 - 02:45am The bible was written by people who didn't even know theworld was round - all religions were written by people who really had little understanding of anything, like their people, but there was a genuine call for order so they were written. These days, thanks to science and technology, we have more of an understanding of what we are, or at least what's required. That's not to say there isn't still a demand for religion/cults. The subject of evolution shows this quite well - not so much the intrigue about what started the ball rolling (evolution could only start after something existed, else it couldn't evolve in the first place), no, the main motivation is the fear of where evolution is going. Millions just aren't prepared to believe that evolution is the answer to our future. That we've got to stay on this earth for millions of years until the inevitable happens and we die out. Well what's the point. Might as well r*pe and steal. No, the anti-evolutionists wanna believe in the second coming, visits, a cuddle of the ideal that we're not alone. Personally, I think it's pretty obvious that we're a part of something that was formed. I also believe we're not here for no reason. But I also believe that we are evolving and it's down to us to take this in the best direction we can for as long as we can, and that religions are proving to be detrimental to that. I believe this because I have my own mind, as i don't have to follow the rules of a book written by someone who didn't have any more of a clue. You explained that well. |
||
@obi_jon | 12 September 15 | |
It has been proven that human beings are still evolving. Studies involving the Sherpas of Nepal into why they don't suffer from altitude sickness have shown that they have evolved to cope with the effects better than the rest of us. Evolution in action
|
||
@black89 | 12 September 15 | |
It's so funny that this topic has two exclamation marks and two question marks, as if it would be a ridiculous thing to believe in evolution.
|
||
@bozzalad | 15 September 15 | |
@ obi_jon - 12.09.15 - 02:01pm It has been proven that human beings are still evolving. Studies involving the Sherpas of Nepal into why they don't suffer from altitude sickness have shown that they have evolved to cope with the effects better than the rest of us. Evolution in action the radiation in kerala is another example |
||