Page #: 2/2 |
@crail | 3 August 12 | |
why did they go back from the n900 browser? thats what i cant understand. it loads ipmart in about 3 seconds. doesnt make sense to go back a step, that is not how business works. even the nokia hands on the n900 are better lol why make them cr*pper on a newer phone like the n8?
|
||
@3mel | 3 August 12 | |
it was never the best browser in the mobile world polo.
|
||
@polo_011 | 3 August 12 | |
@ crail - 3.08.12 - 06:06pm why did they go back from the n900 browser? thats what i cant understand. it loads ipmart in about 3 seconds. doesnt make sense to go back a step, that is not how business works. even the nokia hands on the n900 are better lol why make them cr*pper on a newer phone like the n8? N8 had weaker hardware than N900 and it seems Symbian was just too limited to allow that sort of browser to run on it. @3mel, dont tell me the PIE browser for WM, that browser was a resource hog and lagged. |
||
@3mel | 3 August 12 | |
when i started using symbian opera 8.65 was still better than the native browser in my book. hell even mini too. i only ever touched it wen all else failed, as a lost resort only.
|
||
@polo_011 | 4 August 12 | |
I was thinking more along the lines of built-in browsers, but i guess thats what made Opera/Opera Mini so big, its the fact that many were running away from the S60 browser.
|
||
@polo_011 | 4 August 12 | |
I remember, i used to run Opera8.65 and Opera Mini2 together in my S60s, Opera8.65 dealt with wapsites and Mini with websites.
|
||
@crail | 4 August 12 | |
yes come to think about it ive never used an s60 browser, always opera, ever since 3650. poor show.
|
||
@crail | 4 August 12 | |
so the 'famed' symbian browser has always been famed for being shyte
|
||