You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please
|
@alvar89 | |
|
Both will be out soon. Rumors say the 980 ti will be announced on tuesday and the 390x any time now also. The 980 ti will be alot faster compared to the older 980. Gtx 980ti: GPU name GM200 Clock speed 1,000 MHz Shading units 2,816 Texture mapping units 176 Render output processors 96 Pixel rate 96 GPixel/s Floating-point performance 5,632 GFLOPS Memory clock speed 1,753 MHz Effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz Memory bus 384 bit Memory 6,144 MB Memory type GDDR5 |
||
|
33
Replies
4858
Views
0 Favourites
|
||
Page #: 1/4 |  
|
|
@norega | 31 May 15 |
|
A lott more expensive also . 700 pound for the gtx980ti is rumoured. I wont pay that price for gpu . And not interested in amd junk |
||
|
|
@norega | 31 May 15 |
|
The 980ti is basically a titan with half the vram
|
||
|
|
@alvar89 | 1 June 15 |
|
I think its worth the price as it propably goes between 980 and titan x with the price but the performance leans towards the titan so its a win.
|
||
|
|
@alvar89 | 1 June 15 |
|
Im thinking of upgrading to a new high end card soon and its either the 980 ti or 390x depends on the price to performance ratio. A standard 980 has too little vram many of the games are starting to push it to the limit even on 1080p with msaa and newer graphical settings.
|
||
|
|
@alvar89 | 1 June 15 |
|
Shadow of mordor with ultra texture pack goes beyond 4gb on 1080p. Bet there will be even more demanding games.
|
||
|
|
@norega | 1 June 15 |
|
@ alvar89 - 1.06.15 - 11:09am Im thinking of upgrading to a new high end card soon and its either the 980 ti or 390x depends on the price to performance ratio. A standard 980 has too little vram many of the games are starting to push it to the limit even on 1080p with msaa and newer graphical settings. Gota be really stupid to buy a 980ti for 1080p its such a waste |
||
|
|
@norega | 1 June 15 |
|
Its 2015 every pc gamer should be playing 1400p at least .
|
||
|
@spartan2 | 1 June 15 |
|
Maybe he just likes super smooth framerates? I personally prefer my system to outweigh my resolution, just because you leave a lot of headroom for the future too. Who knows. Seems like a good card but I have a feeling AMD have stolen a small lead in terms of integrating their stacked memory sooner when Nvidia should have had that down pat by now. The problem is it's expensive/harder to fit larger stacked memory cubes presently which is why the Radeon has only 4GB. But it's obviously the future. Nvidia will follow, but they should have led there. |
||
|
|
@norega | 1 June 15 |
|
@ spartan2 - 1.06.15 - 01:59pm Maybe he just likes super smooth framerates? I personally prefer my system to outweigh my resolution, just because you leave a lot of headroom for the future too. Who knows. Seems like a good card but I have a feeling AMD have stolen a small lead in terms of integrating their stacked memory sooner when Nvidia should have had that down pat by now. The problem is it's expensive/harder to fit larger stacked memory cubes presently which is why the Radeon has only 4GB. But it's obviously the future. Nvidia will follow, but they should have led there. Just seems silly using all that power and playing at 2005 resolution of 1080p  High end cards are made for 1400p and above were they really shine as the cpu matters very little the higher you go.I play most games at meduim/high at 4k with a single gtx980 and even at medium setting games look better than old skool 1080p
|
||
|
|
@alvar89 | 2 June 15 |
|
I just want the horsepower to be there first. I hate the minimum fps dips. It ruins the responsiveness and smooth experience. My current gpu cant even max out games anymore on 1080p so its useless to get a sharper screen now.
|
||
|
|
